Talk:Chang'e 5-T1

Latest comment: 1 year ago by 2.44.138.212 in topic Alleged third stage impact crater found.


Chinese Lunar Exploration Program

edit

I think that this deletion is not correct. The 5-T1 test seems to be an intermediary step of the Chinese Lunar Exploration Program. Cheers, BatteryIncluded (talk) 21:22, 15 October 2014 (UTC)Reply

4throck (talk) 11:59, 16 October 2014 (UTC)I put the previous / next missions there in the first place, but agree that it's better without. Since this mission is a technical test, the next mission would be Chang'e 5-T2, if that ever happens.Reply
I guess the "T" stands for test. So if it is not a full mission, the deletion is OK by me then. Cheers, BatteryIncluded (talk) 14:36, 16 October 2014 (UTC)Reply
One hint: the rocket fairing carrying Chang'e 5-T1 actually got the CLEP logo painted on it, so it seems that the Chinese do consider it as a mission in the CLEP program. ;) Galactic Penguin SST (talk) 11:08, 26 October 2014 (UTC)Reply
Of course. It's part of CLEP and that's indicated on the article. Now for the mission box, I still think that this mission is a one off. Anyway don't see a problem there either way.

Use of the term "perilune" is a barbarism, as peri is from the Greek for close while lune is from Latin. NASA ordained during the Apollo era that the term to be used was pericynthion.Tham153 (talk) 23:10, 26 October 2014 (UTC)Reply

Add 4M Mission as Secondary Payload

edit

Following the style of SpaceX CRS-3, I created a "Secondary payloads" section to include information about the 4M mission payload. Are there any other known secondary payloads that may be included? Oreo masta (talk) 22:43, 16 October 2014 (UTC)Reply

The miniature sensors called "Pocket Spacecraft", apparently. Cheers, BatteryIncluded (talk) 01:15, 31 October 2014 (UTC)Reply

Xiaofei

edit

According to [1] this is also called "Xiaofei" -- 67.70.35.44 (talk) 08:12, 1 November 2014 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Chang'e 5-T1. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:14, 8 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

Active?

edit

Is this mission still active? List of active Solar System probes says it is and the "extended mission duration" here seems to agree, but the content of the article doesn't: of the two payloads, one has returned (the capsule), and the other has competed its own mission (4M). Hairy Dude (talk) 01:13, 26 October 2018 (UTC)Reply

Alleged third stage impact crater found.

edit

Could someone upload this image and add it to the article? Thanks. https://www.lroc.asu.edu/posts/1261 --2.47.122.159 (talk) 09:40, 24 June 2022 (UTC)Reply

Even the Indians found it... https://twitter.com/Ramanean/status/1623746378823512064 2.44.138.212 (talk) 21:47, 20 March 2023 (UTC)Reply