Talk:Changi Murals
Changi Murals has been listed as one of the Art and architecture good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | ||||||||||
|
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Comments
editB-class, but could do with more references and in-line citation if possible. Good job again, nonetheless. - SpLoT // 12:21, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
- Hi SpLoT, I've added the in-text citation as per previous references accordingly. Thanks for your favourable assessment & compliments earlier. - Aldwinteo 04:53, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
Since this is actually an article about paintings, don't you think some recognition of this in terms of projects, categories, and even discussion of their style in the article would be a good idea? Johnbod (talk) 22:05, 15 December 2007 (UTC)
- According to my earlier research for this article, except for its history & basic description, there's little references on its style, categories or artistic commentaries known to date. Due to its background & the fact that the site of the paintings is located in a restricted area now, I think it somehow did not generate a follow-up by anyone to do an in-depth research on its artistic aspect in later years. Nonetheless, I welcome anyone who could direct me or include such info with relevant citation where it's available. Thank u for your interest in the article. -- Aldwinteo (talk) 11:55, 17 December 2007 (UTC)
That doesn't stop you adding the correct categories. Johnbod (talk) 12:56, 17 December 2007 (UTC)
- I misunderstood your statement earlier. Nonetheless, I've added it under the "murals" category. As u r more familiar on this area, do add it under the appropriate artistic categories/projects if nec. -- Aldwinteo (talk) 15:37, 17 December 2007 (UTC)
- Thanks a lot, mate. -- Aldwinteo (talk) 00:21, 18 December 2007 (UTC)
Merge
editApols for clunky merge template, but suggest we merge this article with Stanley Warren because the bio is brief stub because it suffers from inter doubling of info from this article - which WP discourages. Changi Murals has so much biography of Warren that suggest the articles be merged either under the painter/artist with a redirect from a Changi Murals link, or if Changi Murals is already a GA maybe a redirect biography link can be made to it. Thanks, Manytexts (talk) 07:10, 9 February 2013 (UTC)
- I think its a bad idea. The biography would be about an image, and nearly anything about the artist himself. Christian75 (talk) 12:34, 15 July 2016 (UTC)
- Manytexts make a good point, entirely consistent with WP:ONEEVENT. That would suggest a merge of Stanley Warren into Changi Murals, as the event (the painting of the murals) is what is notable. However, they could be kept as separate articles if the event and the person have generated sufficient coverage. Given the lasting cultural impact of the murals, it might well be reasonable to keep them as separate pages. I can see the argument either way, but lean towards no merge. Klbrain (talk) 16:34, 17 August 2016 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Changi Murals. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070609134325/http://www.mindef.gov.sg/imindef/about_us/history/world_war2/v04n12_history.html to http://www.mindef.gov.sg/imindef/about_us/history/world_war2/v04n12_history.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:08, 19 November 2016 (UTC)