I disagree with proposed removal of Chapman's Protocol (it was not even mentioned in Lethal Injection page, I had to insert it). This is a term and deserves its place in Wikipedia. If you still persist in removing, go ahead and do it, I have no energy in fighting people who think 2 + 2 = 5. Bosniak 19:07, 13 May 2007 (UTC)
- I agree that Chapman's Protocol deserves its mention in Wikipedia. It seems to me, though, that the Lethal injection page is the appropriate place to mention Chapman's Protocol. There's not enough information here to warrant giving Chapman's Protocol its own article.
- As an aside, I can't help but notice that your user page states that you are "very respectful to respectful people, and very disrespectful to disrespectful people," yet on your first interaction with me you insinuate that I'm a complete idiot who thinks 2+2=5. I am only respectfully disagreeing about the need to give Chapman's Protocol its own article that doesn't introduce any information not already present on the Lethal injection page. Dce7 19:25, 13 May 2007 (UTC)