Talk:Charles Dalziel

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject University of California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles relating to University of California, its history, accomplishments and other topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.University of CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject University of CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject University of CaliforniaUniversity of California articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Biography: Science and Academia

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the science and academia work group (assessed as Low-importance).

California: San Francisco Bay Area Low‑importance

	California portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of California on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject CaliforniaCalifornia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	San Francisco Bay Area portal This article is supported by San Francisco Bay Area task force (assessed as Low-importance).

External links modified

Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Charles Dalziel. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060901220734/http://www.thisoldhouse.com/toh/knowhow/electrical/article/0%2C16417%2C249536%2C00.html to http://www.thisoldhouse.com/toh/knowhow/electrical/article/0%2C16417%2C249536%2C00.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:26, 3 August 2017 (UTC)Reply

REVAS

Latest comment: 5 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

There was a blurb in one of the "Popular" magazines (Mechanics, Science, Electronics) back ca. 1961 about the invention of a device the inventor called the "REVAS" (SAVER spelled backwards). It showed a man next to a light bulb, bare wire in one hand, and the other in a sink full of water. The caption said that the light bulb had been lit moments before. This was the earliest mention of what is now known as the GFCI, Ground Fault Circuit Interrupter. I've tried to find the reference through Google and the magazines' archives, but no luck. So the invention of the GFCI ca. 1961 is correct, but I can't find the reference anymore. ): Paulmmn (talk) 18:39, 16 May 2019 (UTC)Reply

Add topic