Talk:Charles DeWitt Watts/GA1

Latest comment: 9 years ago by AmaryllisGardener in topic GA Review

GA Review

edit

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: AmaryllisGardener (talk · contribs) 22:31, 10 January 2015 (UTC)Reply


Review

edit
GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose, no copyvios, spelling and grammar):   b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):  
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (reference section):   b (citations to reliable sources):   c (OR):  
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):   b (focused):  
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:  
  6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales):   b (appropriate use with suitable captions):  
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:  

Notes

edit

I found only two problems:

  • "In the 1970s he played a major role in establishing the Lincoln Community Health Center." isn't referenced.
  • "Breaking the social customs of racial obstacles, he advocated for certification of African American medical students." may need different wording.

Other than that, it's good! :) --AmaryllisGardener talk 22:45, 10 January 2015 (UTC)Reply