Talk:Charles Dennis Fisher
A fact from Charles Dennis Fisher appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 13 June 2012 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Infobox Cricketer
editDo we really want the large "infobox cricketer" on an article about an eminent classical scholar and Oxford academic? It seems to imply that cricket played a much more important part in his life than was actually the case. — Hebrides (talk) 07:30, 14 December 2013 (UTC)
- This is about notability, not about "what was important to him" (in any case, I don't know how you might judge that when he's not around to ask). As a first-class cricketer, he is notable in WP terms under WP:CRIN and WP:ATH, so it's perfectly right and proper for him to have his cricketing career recorded as other cricketers are in the pages of WP. As he played for three different teams and won a Blue for cricket, it may well have been that cricket was quite important to him anyway. Johnlp (talk) 18:42, 14 December 2013 (UTC)
- Hmmm. It's more about balance. In his obituary in The Times (London), cricket is mentioned in a short 4-line section out of the 80-line piece. And this authoritative 500-word article about him has only eight words about cricket. It is my understanding that Wikipedia aims to reflect the same balance as is displayed in high quality sources which give an overall summary of his life, such as these. Would you concur?
- I might add that I have no connection with cricket, Tacitus, the University of Oxford nor with military service. — Hebrides (talk) 12:09, 15 December 2013 (UTC)
- Ah well, the obituary in Wisden Cricketers' Almanack here mentions nothing but cricket (apart from giving his height!). You'd expect that, of course, in the same way that I would expect his Christ Church obit to stress his Oxford and classics connections. I think the balance as we have it is fine, and that anyone looking him up as a classical scholar will find material and anyone looking him up as a cricketer will also get information in the form they expect from the way other first-class cricketers are treated. Johnlp (talk) 12:22, 15 December 2013 (UTC)
- I might add that I have no connection with cricket, Tacitus, the University of Oxford nor with military service. — Hebrides (talk) 12:09, 15 December 2013 (UTC)
Hey, it appears he stopped playing when he was elected Christ Church Tutor in 1903. Added responsibility. Wisden says he was in the Westminster team for four years so he played at a high level for ten years in all. Must have been keen as a child to have become so good. So, cool, he loved his cricket. Big thing in his life. --Bill (talk) 13:48, 15 December 2013 (UTC)
- Sure he should have infobox military person rather than infobox person anyway? S.G.(GH) ping! 14:21, 15 December 2013 (UTC)
- No. He's not a military person (except in that during the first world war, everyone was). It's fine as it is. Johnlp (talk) 12:11, 16 December 2013 (UTC)
- Sure he should have infobox military person rather than infobox person anyway? S.G.(GH) ping! 14:21, 15 December 2013 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Charles Dennis Fisher. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120523230953/http://www.chch.ox.ac.uk/cathedral/memorials/WW1/Charles-Fisher to http://www.chch.ox.ac.uk/cathedral/memorials/WW1/Charles-Fisher
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:37, 3 August 2017 (UTC)