This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject New Zealand, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of New Zealand and New Zealand-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New ZealandWikipedia:WikiProject New ZealandTemplate:WikiProject New ZealandNew Zealand articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Plants, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of plants and botany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PlantsWikipedia:WikiProject PlantsTemplate:WikiProject Plantsplant articles
Latest comment: 1 year ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Is it productive for a 16-year Wikipedia veteran contributor to leave a snide edit summary, complete with ad hominem- "Redlinks might be deeply embarrassing (to inexperienced editors?), but they encourage article creation" - and remove the internal links to the most closely-related relevant articles in hope that, at some point, someone will create the article pertaining to the specific variety in question? One wonders. As it stands, a reader of the article cannot click straight through to the most closely-related relevant article, which seems counterintuitive navigationally, but hey ho. Surely it would make sense to link to such more specific articles upon their creation? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.109.193.143 (talk) 01:39, 1 January 2023 (UTC)Reply
