This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy articles
Latest comment: 4 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
I'm not sure whether this is the right place to discuss Cahk's proposal for deletion, but I just would like to quickly note the fact that Charles H. Kahn surely is a notable scholar: his 1960 monograph on Anaximander is still the most important reference work on the subject, and his 1979 edition of the Heraclitus fragments likewise remains the most widely cited English translation of Heraclitus, more or less representing the 'standard interpretation' for non-expert scholars. 2A02:1811:C1E:BE00:9B64:9B3A:4B61:8ED3 (talk) 15:54, 4 November 2020 (UTC)Reply