Talk:Charles Pinckney (governor)
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.
Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors |
Untitled
editThis text originally from: http://www.archives.gov/exhibit_hall/charters_of_freedom/constitution/south_carolina.html#Pinckney and should be in the public domain in the US
I really, really dislike the title of this article. It should be Charles Pinckney (governor). RickK 02:25, 17 Nov 2003 (UTC)
I've removed the category for Continental Army officers. CP served in the SC militia, but was never attached to the national army. Lou I 13:18, 9 Jun 2005 (UTC) I dont like these people — Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.188.2.222 (talk) 19:47, 15 January 2013 (UTC)
Vandalism correction
editI believe that this page has been vandalised (see refs - "Pork" family, "Snee House" ?), but I do not have referfences to corect this. Someone else ? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 58.175.84.253 (talk) 05:56, 17 January 2010 (UTC)
- I went to a previous version of the article to correct "Pork" family to Maybank family. The birth and death dates have also been corrected. Here is the vandalism diff. Robert K S (talk) 21:04, 4 February 2010 (UTC)
No religion test clause in article VI is his
editThe constitutional prohibition of religious tests for office in Article VI.
The only mention of religion in the Constitution of the United States prior to the adoption of the First Amendment was the "no religious test" provision of Article VI. The significance of this often-forgotten provision cannot be exaggerated. At the time of the Constitutional Convention in 1787, most of the Colonies still had religious establishments or religious tests for office. It was unimaginable to many Americans that non-Protestants — Catholics, Jews, atheists and others — could be trusted with public office.
"No religious test" proposed at the Constitutional Convention. One aspect of religious liberty was inserted into the Constitution during its framing in Philadelphia.
The role of Charles Pinckney. At the Constitutional Convention, Charles Pinckney (1757-1824), a delegate from South Carolina, proposed that "no religious test shall ever be required as a qualification to any office or public trust under the United States." Though he came from a state that had established the Protestant faith as the state religion, Pinckney represented the new spirit of religious liberty exemplified in the Enlightenment thinking of Jefferson.
A tool for oppression outlawed. Remarkably, the "no religious test" provision passed with little dissent. For the first time in history, a nation had formally abolished one of the most powerful tools of the state for oppressing religious minorities.
This is taken from the First Amendment Center History of Religious Liberty in America" by Charles C Haynes senior scholar[1] This oversight of Charles contribution needs to be added to the article. 97.85.168.22 (talk) 12:12, 13 October 2012 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Charles Pinckney (governor). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070927185420/http://www.nga.org/portal/site/nga/menuitem.29fab9fb4add37305ddcbeeb501010a0/?vgnextoid=0696c9eea881a010VgnVCM1000001a01010aRCRD&vgnextchannel=e449a0ca9e3f1010VgnVCM1000001a01010aRCRD to http://www.nga.org/portal/site/nga/menuitem.29fab9fb4add37305ddcbeeb501010a0/?vgnextoid=0696c9eea881a010VgnVCM1000001a01010aRCRD&vgnextchannel=e449a0ca9e3f1010VgnVCM1000001a01010aRCRD
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:44, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
Family relationship
editThe disambiguation page on Charles Pinckney gives the family relationship between Charles Pinckney (governor) and Charles Cotesworth Pinckney as second cousins, but here they are listed as first cousins once removed. Which is correct? — Dodiad (talk) 10:32, 8 September 2018 (UTC)