Talk:Charles Proxy

Latest comment: 7 years ago by IVORK in topic Contested deletion

Contested deletion

edit

This page should certainly not be speedily deleted because it meets the required criteria:

  • It is discussed in reliable sources as significant in its particular field.
  • It is the subject of multiple third-party manuals, instruction books, or reliable reviews, written by independent authors.
  • It has been recognized as having technical significance by reliable sources.
  • NOTE: Google search for phrsae "Charles Proxy" (with quotes) returns 269,000 results, and is the subject of numerous reviews, tutorials, and has made a large impact on web development.
G'day Mclist & Canary Data, in response to your points, for the first three can you link the reliable sources that state it as significant. Additionally per WP:GHITS, the number of Google hits an article has does not establish notability. — IVORK Discuss 04:57, 6 September 2017 (UTC)Reply