Talk:Charles Torquil de Montalt Fraser
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
.svg){kind=small}
 | It is requested that an image or photograph of Charles Torquil de Montalt Fraser be included in this article to improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific media request template where possible. The Free Image Search Tool or Openverse Creative Commons Search may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites. |
Untitled
editWe have resubmitted this page and hopefully it is now in a more acceptable format than previously which led to its deletion. We hope that Charles Fraser's notability is shown primarily through his position as High Sheriff of West Sussex, but also through his high profile in many well-known organisations in West Sussex and throughout the UK. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Craigantaggart (talk • contribs) 12:27, 14 May 2008
- Who are you and what connection, if any, do you have to him ? Please change the article to conform to Wikipedia style, see Wikipedia:Your_first_article. -- John (Daytona2 · Talk · Contribs) 20:40, 14 May 2008 (UTC)
I know of Charles Fraser and am a supporter of his work as High Sheriff of West Sussex, in Polo, charity, and education in West Sussex and throughout the UK, and believe him to be notable because of it. The reference 'we' above is because I have sought reference material for the article direct from Mr Fraser's PA. Hope this clarifies it a little more. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Craigantaggart (talk • contribs) 10:43, 15 May 2008
- Thanks, the problem was that you appeared to have crashed onto Wikipedia with scant regard for the policies and guidelines. Whenever you participate in any kind of collective project it best to learn and respect the rules of the existing members. You can quickly get up to speed with Wikipedia by reading the Wikipedia:Five pillars and the WP:Manual of style. The various coding techniques you can quickly pick up by observing the edit code used for various effects by other editors in the articles. Having said this, the article is now much improved, thanks. Although there is a potential WP:Conflict of interest issue, I'm perfectly happy with the article content. There is no question of the subjects notability - I'm surprised that the article was initially deleted under the WP:Speedy deletion criteria. Cheers -- John (Daytona2 · Talk · Contribs) 16:12, 15 May 2008 (UTC)
Many thanks for your comments and for accepting the article, and apologies for blundering along to begin with - even though this is my first article, you're quite right that I should have taken more time to understand the existing rules - will carry what I've learned over for any future articles. Thanks again. --Craigantaggart (talk) 16:45, 15 May 2008 (UTC)
user has recreated this article despite the fact that it was recently deleted. also clearly has coi. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.233.122.28 (talk) 13:09, 20 May 2008 (UTC)
- Sufficient notability has been achieved and the article was restored in good faith; user's involvement and coi is not considered to have had a detrimental impact on the content quality. - CobaltBlueTony™ talk 13:15, 20 May 2008 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Charles Torquil de Montalt Fraser. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090129215217/http://ourworld.compuserve.com:80/homepages/gkarmstrong/halgen04.htm to http://ourworld.compuserve.com/homepages/gkarmstrong/halgen04.htm#
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:37, 20 November 2016 (UTC)