Talk:Charles ffoulkes

Latest comment: 1 year ago by 98.224.227.56 in topic Misspelling

Misspelling

edit

Is this person's name really spelled like that? The biography link seems to suggest so... PaladinWhite 22:43, 11 April 2007 (UTC)Reply

Do you mean the capitalization? If so, then yes, everywhere I've seen it it's the same. --Eyrian 23:14, 11 April 2007 (UTC)Reply
The capitalization and double-F. PaladinWhite 00:11, 12 April 2007 (UTC)Reply
In English, the double-f is a special case, and shouldn't be capitalised (although some modern-day holders of such surnames do, especially now databases are set up to automatically capitalise). Other examples are fforbes (eg. Audrey fforbes-Hamilton from To the Manor Born), fforde (eg Arthur fforde). Gwinva 07:26, 23 May 2007 (UTC)Reply
The double-f actually was originally a capital F; in secretary hand, the capital F looks identical to a double-f, so capital F was often misinterpreted as ff, and this was preserved in some surnames even after secretary hand fell into disuse. Vorziblix (talk) 05:40, 20 September 2014 (UTC)Reply
Article Word-initial ff explains this. 98.224.227.56 (talk) 23:55, 6 September 2023 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Charles ffoulkes. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:07, 20 November 2016 (UTC)Reply