"Charlie Albright" wiki article

edit

Hello! First time contributor! A couple edits here I would highly recommend to Charlie Albright's article.

1) Charlie is indeed a composer and improviser, as is proven in the primary sources of his official YouTube channel (YouTube.com/pianomanca) and Soundcloud sites (Soundcloud.com/pianomanca). "Composer" and "Improviser" should therefore be restored in his description. I've been to a recent concert he gave and he also did improvisation as an encore at the Gardner Museum in Boston.

2) Also noticed that the track list description box of his CD was removed...it should be restored, as per other musicians' discographies being a part of their wikis.

Have a great day!

Aznkorea1982 (talk) 17:58, 3 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

Welcome to Wikipedia. You obviously have a close connection to the subject, especially in light of the recent edit warring and sockpuppetry associated with this biography.
Regarding Albright being a composer, none of his compositions have been recognized on their own.
Regarding "improviser" as an occupation; this is not a valid occupation.
Regarding the CD tracks, this is a biography, not an article about an album. Binksternet (talk) 18:14, 3 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

Less focus on childhood accomplishments

edit

Now that Albright is a college graduate, I think the biography should focus less on childhood accomplishments, that a lot of detail should be trimmed away so that the adult career is not obscured. Binksternet (talk) 20:44, 4 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

Article reads like a press release

edit

Article reads like a press release.

Also, what year was he born? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.244.74.98 (talk) 08:14, 23 June 2015 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Charlie Albright. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:25, 3 August 2017 (UTC)Reply

Serious concerns about neutrality of contributors

edit

I have serious concerns about the neutrality of this article, and I think I am not alone in this based on some of the discussions and edit comments made by others.

This page was created back in 2010 by a @Jdanieloh. One of the sources in this article names a "Daniel J. Oh" as Charlie Albright's blockmate in college, which is highly suggestive if not outright demonstrative of a clear conflict of interest. This user has since made a hundred edits (one as late as 2022) that are all related to this article only, many of which are highly opinionated and serve to push a very favourable view of the subject. One example of the more idiosyncratic changes this user has insisted on is calling Albright a "pianist, improviser, and composer", despite the highly non-standard use of "improviser" as an occupation and Albright's relative obscurity as a composer. Furthermore, this user has been caught using a sockpuppet account to support themselves in an edit war, for yet another highly eccentric edit which included an irrelevant photo of Albright in the Steinway and Sons article, and was subsequently blocked for a week.

I do not think this has stopped the obvious shilling. After the sockpuppet investigation, there has been a constant stream of similarly opinionated edits up to the present day, this time from unregistered users. This includes again the weird insistence on calling Albright an "improviser". Jdanieloh's latest edit in 2022 (after no activity since 2015) was to undo a prior edit such that the main photo of the article re-included Joe Biden after another user cropped him out to show only Albright.

Pending a more thorough clean-up of the clearly promotional tone of this article, I think the COI and advert maintenance templates are warranted. Sleedy (talk) 12:47, 20 November 2023 (UTC)Reply