Talk:Charlie Moore (basketball)/GA1

Latest comment: 2 years ago by Buttons to Push Buttons in topic GA Review

GA Review

edit
GA toolbox
Reviewing

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Buttons to Push Buttons (talk · contribs) 02:29, 12 June 2022 (UTC)Reply

Got about an hour now, hopefully I can get it done by then, but if not I'll be able to finish this up tomorrow. Initial impressions are that it's close, but definitely a few surface issues that'll need some work. Nothing too major to worry about, however, so should be alright! Buttons to Push Buttons (talk | contribs) 02:29, 12 June 2022 (UTC)Reply

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose, spelling, and grammar):   b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):  
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (reference section):   b (citations to reliable sources):   c (OR):   d (copyvio and plagiarism):  
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):   b (focused):  
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:  
  6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales):   b (appropriate use with suitable captions):  
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:  

Early life

edit

College career

edit

And that's your lot! In pretty good shape all in all. The prose needs a fine-toothed comb, but is broadly there. One small MOS pickup: the images need alt text, to help with accessibility for vision-impaired users, or those using screen readers. Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Accessibility/Alternative text for images has tips on the best way to tackle this. All references passed verification, and just a couple of places where I think adding refs would be beneficial. There is occasional reliance on non-independent sources, but they're never used for POV claims and aren't relied upon for conveying notability, so I see no issue. No copyvio issues in the text from what I could see, and the detector tool concurs, with just 9.9% similarity.

I've always found the trickiest thing with sports biographies is figuring out how deep to go for the various parts of their career, particularly with regards to WP:RECENTISM. I do wonder if long-term that the college section may end up being too long and unnecessarily detailed, but for this stage of his life & career, I think it's completely fine – an appropriate level of depth for what's brought him notability to date. And speculating that it may need changing later down the road is basically just WP:CRYSTAL, so I think we're all good. I do wonder if it's worth including a table of his career statistics, though -- see, for example, GA-class Jordan Poole#Career statistics. If he only played one season in D1 then I can see not bothering, but I can see the value in including one for a guy who played five seasons. (If you do, I think the table needs a ref to his basketball-ref page (or whatever), even though Poole's actually lacks one. See e.g. the way it's done for FA-class Magic Johnson#NBA career statistics.)

No real NPOV issues, just a few instances of puffery and attribution needed. Clearly in a stable state, particularly as it's the offseason and this stage of his career's just drawn to a close. Images have appropriate licenses – one of your own (nice!) and the other confirmed via Flickrbot, so absolutely no issues.

That's all six sections of the criteria covered. Handle all that and I'll happily grant this a pass -- and it really shouldn't need too much effort to sort it all out, I don't think. Cheers! Buttons to Push Buttons (talk | contribs) 04:12, 12 June 2022 (UTC)Reply

@TonyTheTiger: Alright, been through your changes, and I'm happy with the article in its new state! I did a little more light copyediting just to get everything really tuned up, and I saw you asking for help over at WT:CHOOPS with regards to the career stats section; that kind of thing's in my wheelhouse, so I've gone and added it myself, since it was only marginally non-compliant at that point.
One final note: with the draft having now happened, it's now technically out of date (seems he signed with Detroit?) but like hell am I gonna ding it on that basis -- it's not your fault I was slow to jump on doing the career stats table, and it was up to date at the time you asked for help with that. Really won't take much more than a sentence to get it back up to date, anyway, and I'll go over any such changes with the same rigour (or even just do it myself in a couple days, if needs be). So with that said, I'm happy to pass this as a GA, as I believe it meets all the criteria. Congrats! Buttons to Push Buttons (talk | contribs) 03:02, 1 July 2022 (UTC)Reply
User:Buttons to Push Buttons, thanks for cleaning things up. I bet you didn't know this is my third Moore WP:GA (E'Twaun Moore though not the actual page creator and More Demi Moore).--TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 17:56, 3 July 2022 (UTC)Reply
Haha, very nice! Deliberate or just where your interests happened to take you? Buttons to Push Buttons (talk | contribs) 17:23, 4 July 2022 (UTC)Reply