Talk:Charlie Pace

Themes

Yes, I know the Music theme is a stretch, but I'm not sure whether the info in that section should be deleted as trivial or is really part of an over-arching theme for Charlie. Baryonyx 23:45, 4 November 2005 (UTC)

Removed Trivia

I removed the speculation that Charlie is based on Naveen Andrews' life. This is neither confirmed nor pertinent, especially since the IMDB trivia page (and interviews with Mr. Monaghan I've read) indicate that the part of Charlie was part of the original show concept, but was re-written from a middle-aged fading star to a 20-something after TPTB saw Mr. Monaghan's audition. Occam's Razor would indicate to me that the character of Charlie is more based on the many other rockers who lived Charlie's lifestyle than on Naveen Andrews. In fact, as Damon Lindelof said at Lost-TV, "And the first thing we wrote for the show before there was even a script were character outlines. Like Charlie, for instance. We constructed him as a has-been musician, late 40s who'd been in a band in the '80s and then Dominic Monaghan came in and read and it was like wow! He was so amazing we changed the character and write for him (Dominic)." This pretty much kills any speculation, IMHO.Baryonyx 07:30, 6 December 2005 (UTC)

On the Island

The second half of this (In "Adrift"...) really needs to be fixed up a bit... There are quite a few spelling mistakes and it doesn't read well. --Casiotone 14:23, 18 January 2006 (UTC)

Origins of the character

HEY HEY HEY !!! I THINK CHARLIE PACE IS AN HOMMAGE TO KURT COBAIN !!! JUST COMPARE THEIR LIVES AND YOU'LL AGREE WITH ME !!! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.221.204.153 (talk) 14:25, 10 April 2008 (UTC)

Charlie has alot of parallels with Eddie Dean from Stephen King's Dark Tower Series. They are both heroin addicts thrown into a completely different enviornment. Also when they were young their mother and big brother took care of them and then later on they end up taking care of the big brother. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 24.255.130.146 (talk • contribs) January 25, 2005.

I have a friend named Charlie pace wierd — Preceding unsigned comment added by Yoyoyoyoyoyak47 (talk • contribs) 10:52, 26 May 2012 (UTC)

Oasis

Should the obvious Oasis connections (band from Manchester led by brothers - lead singer named Liam and another one who writes the songs, etc.), be mentioned here? It's mentioned in the article on the (fake) band. john k 18:29, 27 April 2006 (UTC)

Nope, that would be WP:OR -- PKtm 18:39, 27 April 2006 (UTC)

The article on the fake band notes the parallels and cites them to the Lost Season 1 DVD. See Drive Shaft:

The fictional band Drive Shaft and their music were intentionally modeled heavily after real-world band Oasis [2] and many of the details of Drive Shaft (two brothers from Manchester form a rock band and hit it big, having to battle with stardom, sibling rivalry and drug addiction) mirror some of the experiences of Liam and Noel Gallagher of Oasis.

One would assume that press comments that say the band is similar to Oasis could be found, given that the similarities are fairly obvious. Why do you say it constitutes original research? john k 00:31, 28 April 2006 (UTC)

It's not original research: it's on one of the "making of" documentaries accompanying the boxed set for the first series of the DVD, as is the fact that they intended charlie's character to be older, but cast him on spec. I have therefore removed the "citations required" from this section. ElectricRay 17:30, 3 August 2006 (UTC)

OK, it's not original research, but "citations needed" means, well, that a citation should be provided! A reference to the DVD is what's needed here. -- PKtm 21:20, 3 August 2006 (UTC)

It's such a piffling fact that a citation isn't necessary: you don't need to footnote every item in this encyclopaedia (and in any case this discussion should serve as citation enough). The original complaint here was that it was original research: it isn't. It's trivia - which perhaps justifies deletion - but it isn't original research. ElectricRay 21:58, 3 August 2006 (UTC)

I completely disagree. See WP:Verifiability. Way too often on Lost articles, people post the darnedest theories as fact, on the order of "Jack's character is based on Ernest Hemingway", with no citation. You can't tell the sheep from the goats, especially on things like that, without citations. The other article has the citation; I plan to add it when I have a free moment. -- PKtm 22:15, 3 August 2006 (UTC)

ok; whatever. ElectricRay 10:51, 4 August 2006 (UTC)

Does not fail FUC.

Due to the nature of the show Lost (as Edward knows all so well) there are no suits or leaving the island to pop to a movie festival, the image portrays a fictional character in the fictional surroundings, You could not portray the character with a photo of the actor doing general things because that wouldn’t be portraying the character at all. Matthew Fenton (talk) 13:36, 13 November 2006 (UTC)

If our goal is to portray the character, then a description that says "this guy, but without the suit and in need of a shave" would do the exact same thing, just not as pretty. The crazy thing about this is that I've suggested that we can use a character image as long as it's something a little bit more character specific than what we are using. At this point, including the old images is just plain lazy, and not out of necessity. -- Ned Scott 02:47, 20 November 2006 (UTC)

The goal is to portray the character, and there is no better way to do that than use an image of the character. This article, and the others that you are needlessly removing content from, are prime examples of where fair use images can be used. Jtrost (^T | C | _#) 13:20, 20 November 2006 (UTC)

We can use an image of the character, but it's got to be slightly better than just them standing around. That's all. -- Ned Scott 20:19, 20 November 2006 (UTC)

Why? Jtrost (^T | C | _#) 20:35, 20 November 2006 (UTC)

It would make it more of a character-specific image, making for a stronger fair use rational. -- Ned Scott 20:39, 20 November 2006 (UTC)

Can you provide a specific example of what you believe would suffice for a photo? Jtrost (^T | C | _#) 01:31, 21 November 2006 (UTC)

Personally, promotional images are best for portraying the character on the show. And I think you going around and removing them solves nothing. -- Depressed Marvin

It doesn't matter what you or I think , this is policy. -- Ned Scott 21:40, 20 November 2006 (UTC)

Actually, Ned, it's your interpretation of policy. The discussion at Wikipedia talk:Fair use#TV/Film characters who look the same as the actors who portray them shows that there's not really a consensus on this issue. —Josiah Rowe (talk • contribs) 02:31, 21 November 2006 (UTC)

That only means that it defaults to our current policy on living people and fair use images. I'm trying to give you guys a way around this, as I'm sure many editors would rather enforce "no fair use" at all on such an article. All we need is something that is a little more "them" and then we have a stronger rationale for fair use. A little work and we'll save ourselves from a headache down the line. This isn't a big request here. I'll do it myself, when I have the time to look through episodes on DVD. -- Ned Scott 07:36, 21 November 2006 (UTC)

Perhaps it's because I'm an actor myself, but I really do see a difference between an image of the actor and an image of the character, and I don't think that necessarily means showing them doing something character-specific. It does mean showing them in costume and make-up, if applicable — but I don't see why a character portrait has to be treated differently from a character screenshot. Both are copyrighted images, both are used under fair use, and both are designed to show the actor as the character.

My understanding of policy was that fair use images are acceptable for characters but not for actors. That doesn't mean that character images need to look noticeably different from the actor; just that we can use an image with a fair-use claim on Charlie Pace but not on Dominic Monaghan. —Josiah Rowe (talk • contribs) 07:58, 21 November 2006 (UTC)

To be honest, I don't see it as much of a problem, but we did lose all the screen shots on List of Lost episodes, and it would be nice to not make the character articles the next targets. Showing that we are "tough" on our articles will show that we are not willy-nilly with these images, and gives the impression that the images do show something more than just any 'ol image. But if you guys really want to use those images, then go ahead.. -- Ned Scott 08:12, 21 November 2006 (UTC)

Ned you are beginning to get way ahead of your self now with your interpretations of policy, I will say this as bluntly as possible: You are wrong. — I've reverted your removal of the character image. if you wish to begin using actor images to portray a character then get a consensus as laid out in WP:CONSENSUS. thanks/Fenton, Matthew Lexic Dark 52278 Alpha 771 10:44, 21 November 2006 (UTC)

PS: This is the only request I will make towards you: If you make unconstructivee dits to these pages again I will not hesitate to create a user conduct RfC as your recent behaviour is becoming intolerable. thanks/Fenton, Matthew Lexic Dark 52278 Alpha 771 10:46, 21 November 2006 (UTC)

What's the correct spelling of the name of Charlie's band?

In the season 1 & 2 box sets, English subtitles constantly spell the band name "Drive Shaft", not "DriveSHAFT" etc. Has the spelling "DriveSHAFT" (used in all Lost-related articles) been verified anywhere to be the correct, in-canon spelling? (Like some obscure shot of an album cover or band poster in the series which I may have missed.) If so, should there be a notion about the correctness of the spelling versus the one in the DVD subtitles? EDIT: Moreover, it seems both spellings are used in Wikipedia articles - even the DriveSHAFT-section of Charlie's article features a sentence "they won't book Drive Shaft without you." Should we stick to one spelling only? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 88.112.48.162 (talk) 22:56, 5 February 2007 (UTC). Reply by Darc10222: I would have agreed with you but on the official Drive Shaft website it is spelled as DriveSHAFT (http://www.driveshaftband.com/). Plus I don't think the subtitles are gonna have the correctly used spelling of a band name.

That's just a fansite. It isn't affiliated with the show, so I don't know why we're using it's spelling. The spelling actually used on screen has consistently been "Drive Shaft", so I'm going to change it. DocNox 22:45, 14 June 2007 (UTC)

In screenshots from Lost, the band name seems to be spelled as two words. The same goes for ABC's episode descriptions. Whether one word or two, I don't think I've seen it with SHAFT in all caps and Drive in title case anywhere in the show. The most common forms seem to be Drive Shaft and DriveShaft. For what it's worth, Lostpedia decided on Drive Shaft after some discussion. Based on the evidence from the show, I'm inclined to change it to Drive Shaft in this article if there are no objections. kane2742 (talk) 00:31, 30 June 2009 (UTC)

Potential Deaths

Could a little section be devoted to the number of times he has almost died? Seeing as how Charlie is apparently "destined" to bite the dust and has a handful of times, I think it would be interesting to include a sub-section list of close calls. StarIV 08:51, 17 February 2007 (UTC)

Charlie's middle name

There is no mention anywhere of a particular reason for the choosing of charlie's middle name, as there is for the surnames for John Locke or Desmond Hume or Danielle Rousseau. What's the connection? Is there some peculiar character trait in the painter that is reflected in Charlie's character, or is it just random? I can't find any sources on the subject.

The only connection I can make is to the Dutch painter: Hieronymus Bosch. It's the only other Hieronymus I'm aware of. Is it officially his middle name, though? We only see the name once, during Desmond's "flashbacks" after the Swan explodes. 63.115.56.2 (talk) 20:21, 21 February 2008 (UTC) (epynephrin)

Yes, I believe it to be a direct link to Hieronymus Bosch. Garden of Earthly Delights seems to be a connection to the island, it's pretty amazing. Pretty clever those creators of Lost are, lol. —Preceding unsigned comment added by IdentityS (talk • contribs) 09:15, 15 April 2008 (UTC)

Tense

Should the artile be changed to past tense, now that he's confirmed as dead? I don't really know the policy on this, but if it's worth mentioning, it was changed to past tense on Lostpedia. ɱўɭĩє^{What did I do}_wrong 16:32, 2 June 2007 (UTC)

I'm not sure, but I'd say not - keep it in present tense - considering Boone, Shannon and Ana Lucia's articles (just a few examples) are still written in present tense regardless of the fact they've all been dead for quite some time. Theoretically it should be written in past tense but it's in present to maintain consistency throughout the character pages. •97198 talk 15:12, 16 June 2007 (UTC)

Similarities to Oasis

Is the section really necessary? I don't think it is at all. The issue will always be original research. It may be addressed slightly in a podcast, but never enough for there to be a whole section on it. I really think it's more in the realm of Lostpedia. Millancad 04:28, 21 June 2007 (UTC)

I think you would have to be blind to not see 'Driveshaft' is based heavily on Oasis! Even an American audience where they arn't quite as big must be able to see it.

This article is awful - it's currently completely in 'in-universe' style and it needs to be completely re-written. - Jw2034 17:03, 10 Nov 2007 (GMT)

Death?

I think we shouldn't list him as dead, rather "probably dead" or something like it. Even though Desmond had predicted it, for all we know he could have survived and crawled out the port hole and come back for the 4th season. Maybe it is just wishful thinking, but until we know for sure, I think it should be changed. Nateabel 05:32, 2 August 2007 (UTC)

Agreed, I'll change it to unknown. --69.110.18.114 (talk) 05:19, 24 January 2008 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Charlielost.PNG

Image:Charlielost.PNG is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

Style

This article is written in a poor in-universe style. Would whoever keeps undoing my edits, particualrly to 'Driveshaft' to correct this please stop or provide some contribution. Thanks. -- Jw2034 17:30, 10 Novenmber 2007 (GMT)

Charlie Season Four

I think Charlie will be in season four, because he is in the official trailer for season four.... at 23 seconds for a VERY brief moment, there is a shot of him talking to Hurley. I was able to get a screenshot of it by pausing it RIGHT when I needed to. Here is a cropped version of the screenshot...

Driveshaft as a Section

Personally, for the sake of organisation, I think DriveShaft alone shouldn't be a section of this article. Rather, I think it would be better if it were rewritten into a bigographical piece and made a subcategory and put under the prior to the crash category. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Sylar07 (talk • contribs) 22:07, 13 November 2008 (UTC)

Status in Season 4

The opening paragraph says "Dominic Monaghan was billed as a guest star in season four". Unless I'm mistaken, this is incorrect. Monaghan was still listed onscreen as starring in episode 4x01 (and did not appear at all in subsequent episodes). He was never a guest star. 82.121.238.14 (talk) 12:34, 17 December 2008 (UTC)

Yeah, he was billed as a regular for 4x01 but not the rest of the season, as he didn't appear. --CF90 (talk) 13:45, 13 June 2009 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with File:Driveshaft.JPG

The image File:Driveshaft.JPG is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check

• That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
• That this article is linked to from the image description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --12:54, 7 February 2009 (UTC)

Return

Uh, it's since been confirmed that it's Flashforward, not Lost. So I removed it. --CF90 (talk) 13:44, 13 June 2009 (UTC)

according to ZAP2IT, he is making a guest appearance on LOST. If it is just in flashback or such, then I agree that it does not merit being in the article. If he is indeed returning (Ie, the INCIDENT) worked........Whippletheduck (talk) 15:40, 13 June 2009 (UTC)

I'd also point out that if he does return we will get confirmation soon. Personally, i think Jacob knew it, and that is why he left that guitar with Hurley, to make sure it would bring back Charlie somehow. Whippletheduck (talk) 02:55, 1 July 2009 (UTC)

updating, Dominic said at Comic-Con that he is coming back to the show as Charlie Pace. Seem's pretty sourceable to me.

Blacklisted Links Found on the Main Page

Cyberbot II has detected that page contains external links that have either been globally or locally blacklisted. Links tend to be blacklisted because they have a history of being spammed, or are highly innappropriate for Wikipedia. This, however, doesn't necessarily mean it's spam, or not a good link. If the link is a good link, you may wish to request whitelisting by going to the request page for whitelisting. If you feel the link being caught by the blacklist is a false positive, or no longer needed on the blacklist, you may request the regex be removed or altered at the blacklist request page. If the link is blacklisted globally and you feel the above applies you may request to whitelist it using the before mentioned request page, or request it's removal, or alteration, at the request page on meta. When requesting whitelisting, be sure to supply the link to be whitelisted and wrap the link in nowiki tags. The whitelisting process can take its time so once a request has been filled out, you may set the invisible parameter on the tag to true. Please be aware that the bot will replace removed tags, and will remove misplaced tags regularly.

Below is a list of links that were found on the main page:

• http://www.lostpedia.com/wiki/Charlie_Pace

  Triggered by \blostpedia\.com\b on the global blacklist

If you would like me to provide more information on the talk page, contact User:Cyberpower678 and ask him to program me with more info.

From your friendly hard working bot.—cyberbot II ^Notify_Online 17:27, 8 December 2013 (UTC)