Talk:Charlie Shreck

Latest comment: 8 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Neutral Point of View?!

edit

In keeping with Wikipedia Policy and Guidelines, this article[1] should be revised.

At present, the article is not only inaccurate (e.g. Charlie Shreck has never played for Sussex CCC), but violates Wikipedia's policy for articles being written from a neutral point of view (NPOV). This article is clearly not based on a neutral point of view.

If this article is to be cited, the article should be based on statistics rather than the author's personal opinion. Fairgame24 22:13, 4 October 2006 (UTC)Reply

I have removed the reference to Sussex.DuncanHill 14:09, 17 May 2007 (UTC)Reply

edit

Reasons outlined in previous comment. Fairgame24 22:35, 4 October 2006 (UTC)Reply

WikiProject class rating

edit

This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as stub, and the rating on other projects was brought up to Stub class. BetacommandBot 08:28, 10 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Charlie Shreck. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:15, 20 November 2016 (UTC)Reply