Talk:Charlie and the Bhoys

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Charlie and the Bhoys. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150518111907/http://celticfanzone.net/ban-charlie-the-bhoys-but-you-can-march-all-summer/ to http://celticfanzone.net/ban-charlie-the-bhoys-but-you-can-march-all-summer/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:48, 20 November 2016 (UTC)

Conflict of Interest

It appears that some editors may have clear conflicts of interest, such as User:charlieandthebhoys who recently reverted my COPYVIO removal. Uamaol (talk) 13:35, 19 February 2017 (UTC)

I don't remove. I revert the page back the original. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Charlieandthebhoys (talk • contribs) 13:53, 19 February 2017 (UTC)

YOUR EDIT! Completely wrong! It didn't get moved to Blantyre.

@Charlieandthebhoys: I provided a reference which was already in the references section of this article which disproves this! How are you an authority on the matter anyway? Uamaol (talk) 14:30, 19 February 2017 (UTC)

The gig got moved to Glasgow. The article in the paper was correct at time of print. Are you connected with the band Uamaol? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Charlieandthebhoys (talk • contribs) 14:36, 19 February 2017 (UTC)

The article says otherwise. Until you can provide a credible source then it can't be contested. I cannot take your word for it. I am not, no. Are you going to answer my question or not? Uamaol (talk) 14:44, 19 February 2017 (UTC)

Conflict of interest #2

At least one major contributor to this article appears to have a close personal or professional connection to the topic, and thus to have a conflict of interest. Conflict-of-interest editors are strongly discouraged from editing the article directly, but are always welcome to propose changes on the talk page (i.e., here). You can attract the attention of other editors by putting {{request edit}} (exactly so, with the curly parentheses) at the beginning of your request, or by clicking the link on the lowest yellow notice above. Requests that are not supported by independent reliable sources are unlikely to be accepted.

Please also note that our Terms of Use state that "you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation." An editor who contributes as part of his or her paid employment is required to disclose that fact. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 17:48, 27 February 2017 (UTC)