Talk:Charlotte Despard

Latest comment: 3 years ago by Andesitic in topic Atrocious writing
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Charlotte Despard. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:25, 20 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

Lede

edit

The lede describes her as a Sinn Féin activist, vegetarian and anti-vivisection advocate. None of these are referenced in the article. Valetude (talk) 06:49, 6 February 2017 (UTC)Reply

Co-author of 'Outlawed'?

edit

The article refers to a redlink template but says that Despard was co-author of 'Outlawed' with Mabel Collins but that article refers to co-author as Alice Chapin.[1]. Can another editor clarify the position and relationship to Despard (if any?). Thanks, I am a relatively new editor, Kaybeesquared (talk) 22:19, 9 December 2020 (UTC)Reply

References

Atrocious writing

edit

This article suffers from a bizarre flaw in which the subject's surname is repeated, over and over again. This is horrifically jarring and makes the article almost unreadable. You do not repeat a person's name; you use pronouns.

This error is so truly weird that I feel the need to ask about it here. Why has someone written the article in this way? How did anyone not know how pronouns are used? It must be one person; I do not believe that multiple people could all fail to understand such a simple point of grammar. Andesitic (talk) 22:43, 3 February 2021 (UTC)Reply

Amended text Kaybeesquared (talk) 23:15, 3 February 2021 (UTC)Reply
That is a significant improvement. Investigating the article history, I see it was in fact you who quite deliberately removed pronouns and replaced them with repetitions of her surname, eg in this edit. What was your reason for doing that? Have you done this in other articles as well? Andesitic (talk) 16:15, 5 February 2021 (UTC)Reply
Reviewed now all such changes, amended all relevant articles'texts per another editor discussion (just had misunderstood some guidance). NFA required. Thanks.Kaybeesquared (talk) 12:42, 6 February 2021 (UTC)Reply
You misunderstood some guidance? Which guidance? On Wikipedia or elsewhere? I cannot understand how you could possibly have thought your changes were beneficial and I'm horrified to see that you had made them to dozens of articles. Andesitic (talk) 00:48, 8 February 2021 (UTC)Reply