Talk:Charmeleon

Image Copyright

Is this image copyright free? RickK 03:57, 5 Oct 2003 (UTC)

If you click on it, it gives the Pokémon copyright. Sonic Mew 12:00, Jun 3, 2005 (UTC)

Concern for the "characteristics" section...

It says that the horn in the back of its head is really a penis... Um, is this true? I'm suspecting it's vandalism, and if it's not, how about a source to verify it? If you can't put an outside source, at least state the episode or place where this was found. Abby724 20:14, 22 October 2006 (UTC)

Since it got removed, I suspect it was just some random bullshit. TheBlazikenMaster 02:02, 2 January 2007 (UTC)

GA

This seemed really well-written. Matt Yeager ♫ (Talk?) 00:01, 10 April 2007 (UTC)

That's why it's listed as "Good Article". TheBlazikenMaster 00:02, 10 April 2007 (UTC)

An article being well-written isn't a reason to not nominate an article for GA status first before instantly tagging it, (nominating first is mandatory) and definently doesn't say anything about every other criteria in WP:WIAGA. I've removed the GA tag. Homestarmy 03:28, 14 April 2007 (UTC)

Well, everyone can do mistakes. I know it was just a simple mistake nominating it. But that's ok, not every article has to be perfect. If every article was perfect, there would nothing on Wikipedia to do other than vandalism reverting. I'm not saying it's a good thing that it isn't a good article. I'm just saying that not everything can be perfect, and everyone can falsely tag articles. TheBlazikenMaster 20:54, 14 April 2007 (UTC)

An article doesn't have to be perfect to be a GA, but it at least can't just bypass the whole system and not even have an adequate review to boot, part of the review is often how a reviewer can suggest improvements to be made in an article, and "this seemed really well-written" doesn't help much. Being well-written isn't the only GA criteria anyway.... Homestarmy 02:25, 15 April 2007 (UTC)