Talk:Check Point VPN-1
This article was nominated for deletion on 3 October 2024. The result of the discussion was redirect. |
This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Advertisement?
editFrom Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from Next Generation Firewall)
...
As is, this article (and the redirect for `Next generation firewall') suggests that this particular firewall is the only `next generation firewall' out there, and is therefore better than everything else out there. NPOV violation? If others agree, I'd suggest either 1) adding other firewalls that have similar functionality, or 2) removing the redirect. (The article for Stateful firewall has a link for Next Generation Firewall.)
dougmc 17:54, 12 November 2006 (UTC)
- I don't think it was an NPOV issue, but rather that the name of the CheckPoint product line at one point was "Next Generation". At any rate, that branding name has been minmized, so I doubt anybody would search for it. I think we could remove the redirect. --Bill.matthews 16:47, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
i agree to remove the redirect, reading it i felt like that checkpoint's firewall was the only "NG" firewall. beside, its not really next generation anyway, statefull and lvl7 filtering have been around for YEARS ^^
Article itself looks like presale pamphlet (I actually came here for successful penetration story, when group of hackers thanked firewall (old story, before renaming) developers) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 91.78.141.137 (talk) 16:56, 21 February 2011 (UTC)
Tagged with Template:COI. Not quite an advert, but the tone used in the article really points at COI editing. Problems include:
- Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information
- Some red wikilinks, suggesting low notability facts
- Comparing the article subject against "competitors" and how it's different, while some statements are really low encyclopedic value
- Holy moly those primary sources (WP:REFBOMB). Press releases and one source.
Rename to VPN-1
editThe product has been called VPN-1 for several years now, I am going to rename it and add a redirect. Gavint0 (talk) 09:50, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
- It was called VPN-1 but its name changed again few months ago. Now it is called simply Firewall or Check Point Firewall Software Blade. Please see the web page of the product. [1] VPN-1 (Power/UTM) Gateway is now called simply Check Point Security Gateway. See also the names change in the release notes. [2] Probably articles for products which often change name should be called in a more general way like Check Point firewall for example. --pabouk (talk) 14:45, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
- Fair point, I guess it is now diverged slightly as the firewall software blade is in a different section of the website to their appliances. Check Point Security Gateway might be the best name? Gavint0 (talk) 16:46, 11 April 2009 (UTC)
Definition of NG and NGX
editDoes anyone know the definition or expansion of the initials NG or NGX? I'm assuming Network Gateway and Network Gateway eXtended. I cannot find any information to support my assertions. Does anyone find that information useful for the article? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 130.76.112.27 (talk) 19:53, 12 December 2018 (UTC)
I've learned that NG is "Next Generation", NG AI is "Next Generation with Application Intelligence. Not yet sure what NGX is.[1] — Preceding unsigned comment added by 130.76.112.27 (talk) 20:20, 12 December 2018 (UTC)
References
- ^ Configuring Check Point NGX VPN-1/Firewall-1 by Barry J Stiefel; Simon Desmeules Published by Syngress, 2005
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on Check Point VPN-1. Please take a moment to review my edit. You may add {{cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it, if I keep adding bad data, but formatting bugs should be reported instead. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether, but should be used as a last resort. I made the following changes:
- Attempted to fix sourcing for //www.lantimes.com/96jun/606s052b.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 16:54, 29 March 2016 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Check Point VPN-1. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120526155602/http://www.checkpoint.com/press/2012/041712-introducing-gaia-with-latest-r75.40-release.html to http://www.checkpoint.com/press/2012/041712-introducing-gaia-with-latest-r75.40-release.html
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110129154326/http://www.checkpoint.com:80/services/lifecycle/support-periods.html to http://www.checkpoint.com/services/lifecycle/support-periods.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:52, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 6 external links on Check Point VPN-1. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080704141747/http://www.checkpoint.com/press/1997/patent2.html to http://www.checkpoint.com/press/1997/patent2.html
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20061018051256/http://www.checkpoint.com/press/2005/express_ci_041105.html to http://www.checkpoint.com/press/2005/express_ci_041105.html
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081014065833/http://www.checkpoint.com/press/2007/utm1120307.html to http://www.checkpoint.com/press/2007/utm1120307.html
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090503055400/http://www.checkpoint.com/press/2009/ips-software-blade-022409.html to http://www.checkpoint.com/press/2009/ips-software-blade-022409.html
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100425153702/http://www.checkpoint.com/press/2010/041310-utm-1-enhancements.html to http://www.checkpoint.com/press/2010/041310-utm-1-enhancements.html
- Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.checkpoint.com/services/lifecycle/support-periods.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:02, 4 August 2017 (UTC)
Version History Moved from main article
editVersion history
editThe VPN-1 version naming can be rather confusing because Check Point have changed the version numbering scheme several times through the product's history. Initially, the product used a traditional decimal version number such as 3.0, 4.0 and 4.1 (although 4.1 was also called Check Point 2000 on the packaging). Then the version changed to NG meaning Next Generation and minor revisions became known as Feature Packs. Then the name changed to NG AI which meant NG with Application Intelligence, and the minor revisions became known as Rxx e.g. NG AI R54. Most recently, the version name has changed to NGX.
The product is licensed in several variants. In the decimal releases, the license determined what encryption strength was available for the VPN (DES or "Strong"). Since NG, the license always includes strong cryptographic capabilities and was instead split into VPN-1 Pro or VPN-1 Express. VPN-1 Express was intended for simplified deployment while VPN-1 Pro provided more configurability. In NGX R62, the branding was changed to VPN-1 Power (instead of Pro) and VPN-1 UTM (instead of Express). VPN-1 UTM includes certain content inspection features such as antivirus and more recently, web filtering.
Version 3.0 was also sold by Sun Microsystems as Solstice FireWall-1. This was essentially the same product, but with slightly different packaging and file system layout.
The table below shows the version history. The Platforms column shows the operating systems that are supported by the firewall product:
Version | Release date | Platforms | Notes |
---|---|---|---|
1.07 | April 1994 | SunOS 4.1.3, Solaris 2.3 | [1][2] |
2.0 | Sep 1995 | SunOS, Solaris, Solaris x86, HP-UX | Firewall Zone-1 (later called FWZ-1) encryption scheme introduced[3] |
2.1 | Jun 1996 | SunOS, Solaris, Solaris x86, HP-UX, Windows NT 3.51 | |
3.0 | Oct 1996 | SunOS, Solaris, Solaris x86, HP-UX, Windows NT 3.51, Windows 95 (VPN Client) | |
3.0a | |||
3.0b | Feb 1997 | Windows NT 3.5 and 4.0; Solaris 2.5, 2.5.1 and 2.6; HP-UX 10.x; AIX 4.1.5, 4.2.1 | |
4.0 | Jun 1998 | Windows NT 4.0, Solaris 2.5, 2.5.1, 2.6 and 7 (32-bit); HP-UX 10.x; AIX 4.2.1 and 4.3.0 | |
4.1 | 2000 | Windows NT 4.0 and 2000; Solaris 2.6, 7 and 8 (32-bit); HP-UX 10.20 and 11; Red Hat Linux 6.2 and 7.0 (2.2 kernel); IPSO 3.4.1 and 3.5; AIX 4.2.1, 4.3.2 and 4.3.3 | Also known as Check Point 2000 |
NG | Jun 2001 | Windows NT 4.0 and 2000; Solaris 7 (32-bit) and 8 (32 or 64-bit); Red Hat Linux 6.2 and 7.0 (2.2 kernel) | NG stands for Next Generation |
NG FP1 | Nov 2001 | Windows NT 4.0 and 2000; Solaris 7 (32-bit) and 8 (32 or 64-bit); Red Hat Linux 6.2, 7.0 (2.2 kernel) and 7.2 (2.4 kernel), IPSO 3.4.2 | |
NG FP2 | Apr 2002 | Windows NT 4.0 and 2000; Solaris 7 (32-bit) and 8 (32 or 64-bit); Red Hat Linux 6.2, 7.0 (2.2 kernel) and 7.2 (2.4 kernel), IPSO 3.5 and 3.6, SecurePlatform NG FP2 | FWZ-1 encryption scheme removed |
NG FP3 | Aug 2002 | Windows NT 4.0 and 2000; Solaris 8 (32 or 64-bit) and 9 (64-bit); Red Hat Linux 7.0 (2.2 kernel), 7.2 and 7.3 (2.4 kernel), IPSO 3.5, 3.5.1 and 3.6, SecurePlatform NG FP3 | |
NG AI R54 | Jun 2003 | Windows NT 4.0 and 2000; Solaris 8 (32 or 64-bit) and 9 (64-bit); Red Hat Linux 7.0 (2.2 kernel), 7.2 and 7.3 (2.4 kernel), IPSO 3.7, SecurePlatform NG AI, AIX 5.2 | The full name is NG with Application Intelligence |
NG AI R55 | Nov 2003 | Windows NT 4.0, 2000 and 2003; Solaris 8 (32 or 64-bit) and 9 (64-bit); Red Hat Linux 7.0 (2.2 kernel), 7.2 and 7.3 (2.4 kernel), IPSO 3.7 and 3.7.1, SecurePlatform NG AI | Version branches: NG AI R55P (for IPSO 3.8), NG AI R55W (contains web intelligence) |
NG AI R57 | April 2005 | SecurePlatform NG AI R57 | For product Check Point Express CI (Content Inspection), later VPN-1 UTM (Unified Threat Management)[4] |
NGX R60 | Aug 2005 | Windows 2000 and 2003; Solaris 8 and 9 (64-bit); RHEL 3.0 (2.4 kernel), IPSO 3.9 and 4.0, SecurePlatform NGX | Version branches: NGX R60A |
NGX R61 | Mar 2006 | Windows 2000 and 2003; Solaris 8, 9 and 10; RHEL 3.0 (2.4 kernel), IPSO 3.9, 4.0 and 4.0.1, SecurePlatform NGX | |
NGX R62 | Nov 2006 | Windows 2000 and 2003; Solaris 8, 9 and 10; RHEL 3.0 (2.4 kernel), IPSO 3.9 and 4.1, SecurePlatform NGX | |
NGX R65 | Mar 2007 | Windows 2000 and 2003; Solaris 8, 9 and 10 (Ultra-SPARC architecture); RHEL 3.0 (2.4 kernel), IPSO 4.1 and 4.2, SecurePlatform, SecurePlatform 2.6 | Version branches: NGX R65 with Messaging Security (Dec 2007),[5] R65.4 (Feb 2009) |
R70 | Feb 2009 | Windows 2003 and 2008; IPSO 6.0.7 and 6.2; SecurePlatform; XOS[6] | [7] Minor versions: R70.1, R70.20 (2009), R70.30 (March 2010), R70.40 (Dec 2010), R70.50 (Oct 2011) |
R71 | April 2010 | Windows 2003 and 2008; IPSO 6.2; SecurePlatform; XOS[8] | [9] Minor versions: R71.10, R71.20, R71.30, R71.40 |
R75 | January 2011 | Windows 2003 and 2008; IPSO 6.2; SecurePlatform; Crossbeam XOS 9.5 or later;[10] Gaia (since R75.40)[11] | [12] Installation files were publicly available in December 2010.
Minor versions: R75.10 (May 2011), R75.20 (Sep 2011), R75.30 (Jan 2012), R75.40 (April 2012), R75.46 (Feb 2013), R75.47 (Jul 2013) |
R76 | May 2013 | Windows 2003 and 2008; IPSO 6.2 MR4; SecurePlatform; Gaia; [13] | As of R76 Check Point prefers GAIA as Operating System. R76 also introduces full support for IPv6. |
R77 | Aug 2013 | Minor versions: R77.10, R77.20, R77.30 (May 2015) | |
R80 | Mars 2016 | Minor Version: R80.10 (17th May 2017), R80.20 (26th Sept 2018), R80.30 (7th May 2019), R80.40 (28th Jan 2020) | |
R81 | 22nd Oct 2020 | Minor Version: R81.10 (6th July 2021) |
Hagennos (talk) 03:16, 16 December 2017 (UTC)
References
- ^ "Check Point Introduces Revolutionary Internet Firewall Product Providing Full Internet Connectivity with Security; Wins 'BEST OF SHOW' Award at Networld+Interop '94" (Press release). Check Point Software Technologies Ltd. 1994-05-06. Retrieved 2007-03-14.
- ^ "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations" (PDF). Check Point Software Technologies Ltd. 1998-07-24. Retrieved 2007-03-14.
{{cite journal}}
: Cite journal requires|journal=
(help) - ^ Tolly, Kevin; Curtis, John; Passarge, Elke (June 17, 1996), "Firewall-1 2.0", LANTimes, archived from the original on January 9, 1997
{{citation}}
: Unknown parameter|deadurl=
ignored (|url-status=
suggested) (help) - ^ "Check Point Adds Antivirus Protection to Integrated Security Solution for Mid-sized Businesses" (Press release). Check Point Software Technologies Ltd. 2005-04-11. Archived from the original on 2006-10-18. Retrieved 2007-03-14.
{{cite press release}}
: Unknown parameter|deadurl=
ignored (|url-status=
suggested) (help) - ^ "Check Point Introduces Groundbreaking New UTM-1 Total Security Solutions, Now Including Best-In-Class Messaging Security" (Press release). Check Point Software Technologies Ltd. 2007-12-03. Archived from the original on 2008-10-14. Retrieved 2008-01-25.
{{cite press release}}
: Unknown parameter|deadurl=
ignored (|url-status=
suggested) (help) - ^ XOS was supported in older releases already but was not mentioned in release notes. Solaris and Red Hat Enterprise Linux is supported for the management server only.
- ^ "Check Point Introduces Latest Security Gateway and Management Release Based On New Software Blade Architecture" (Press release). Check Point Software Technologies Ltd. 2009-02-24. Archived from the original on 2009-05-03. Retrieved 2009-03-28.
{{cite press release}}
: Unknown parameter|deadurl=
ignored (|url-status=
suggested) (help) - ^ Solaris and Red Hat Enterprise Linux is supported for the management server only.
- ^ "Check Point Raises the Bar on Performance of Antivirus and URL Filtering Software Blades" (Press release). Check Point Software Technologies Ltd. 2010-04-13. Archived from the original on 2010-04-25. Retrieved 2010-06-04.
{{cite press release}}
: Unknown parameter|deadurl=
ignored (|url-status=
suggested) (help) - ^ Solaris, Red Hat Enterprise Linux and Windows XP/7 is supported for the management server only.
- ^ "Archived copy". Archived from the original on 2012-05-26. Retrieved 2012-04-20.
{{cite web}}
: Unknown parameter|deadurl=
ignored (|url-status=
suggested) (help)CS1 maint: archived copy as title (link) - ^ "Archived copy". Archived from the original on 2011-01-29. Retrieved 2011-02-14.
{{cite web}}
: Unknown parameter|deadurl=
ignored (|url-status=
suggested) (help)CS1 maint: archived copy as title (link) - ^ Windows 2008 R2, Solaris, Red Hat Enterprise Linux and Windows XP/7 is supported for the management server only.
Notability
editCurrently, the only two references are to the corporate website. This indicates a serious notability problem. I'm posting a banner, hopefully this can be resolved. Seazzy (talk) 17:23, 5 January 2018 (UTC)