Talk:Cheetah Print

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Songs, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of songs on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SongsWikipedia:WikiProject SongsTemplate:WikiProject Songssong

Hip-hop Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Hip-hop, a collaborative effort to build a useful resource for and improve the coverage of hip-hop on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.Hip-hopWikipedia:WikiProject Hip-hopTemplate:WikiProject Hip-hopHip-hop
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Requested move 13 June 2026

Latest comment: 2 months ago5 comments3 people in discussion

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: page moved. Cheromaniii (talk) 03:04, 16 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

Cheetah Print (song) → Cheetah Print – Cheetah Print is currently being redirected to Animal print, which I don't think is necessary. I think "Cheetah print" (the fashion-type) redirecting to Animal print and a disambiguation being added would clear it up. Cheromaniii (talk) 02:31, 13 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

Support or at least DAB per WP:DIFFCAPS. Crouch, Swale (talk) 19:49, 13 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

@Cheromaniii: Just to make sure you know, people aren't supposed to close the RM discussions that they nominated themselves. But this case seems pretty obvious, so I see no need to revert the self-closure. —⁠ ⁠BarrelProof (talk) 04:15, 16 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

Didn't know, my apologies. Thanks for letting me know. Won't happen in the future. Cheromaniii (talk) 04:19, 16 June 2026 (UTC)Reply