Wikipedia

Talk:Chehalis River (Washington)

Latest comment: 2 years ago by OlyDLG in topic Navigability
Learn more about this page

Untitled

edit
Latest comment: 14 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion

I'm removing this claim: The Chehalis River is the largest river system located entirely within Washington state. Only the Columbia River located in British Columbia, Washington, and Oregon is larger.

It's unclear whether "largest" means the size of the watershed/drainage basin or the volume of water flow. There is no info on the page about water flow and the external links don't provide that info. It might be true that the Chehalis has the largest flow of any river entirely within the state, but "only the Columber River is larger" seems unlikely.. what about the Snake, the Pend Oreille, the Skagit? These are big rivers. If "largest" means the size of the watershed, then the claim is definitely not true, as the Yakima River and Crab Creek both have larger watersheds entirely within the state. Pfly 18:51, 12 January 2007 (UTC)Reply

That looks like a good call to me. [1] I was surprised how big the Yakima and Chelan watershed areas are. Walter Siegmund (talk) 19:01, 12 January 2007 (UTC)Reply
The pronunciation listed on the page could be changed. I live in Rochester near the Chehalis River and it's always been pronounced like the city Chehalis (shuh-hay-lis - would type in IPA but don't know how to insert the symbols). Many people outside the area tend to say (tchuh-hay-lis), I've noticed, so perhaps listing both pronunciations would be most accurate? Redtitan (talk) 20:05, 8 October 2010 (UTC)Reply

Additional resources

edit
Latest comment: 13 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

There is material at [2] that may be of interest. - J. Johnson (JJ) (talk) 22:10, 18 April 2011 (UTC)Reply

edit
Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Chehalis River (Washington). Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 06:07, 28 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit
Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Chehalis River (Washington). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:22, 9 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit
Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Chehalis River (Washington). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:15, 21 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit
Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on Chehalis River (Washington). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:58, 4 August 2017 (UTC)Reply

edit
Latest comment: 2 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Perhaps a sentence about how much of it is ocean-going vessel navigable, e.g., there are "Ports" in Centralia and Chehalis, though those are pretty far from the coast: what size ship is able to navigate that far up the river? Are those ports for ocean-going vessels? If so, what kind, i.e., heavy freight, fishing, etc.? OlyDLG (talk) 04:14, 5 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

Add topic
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Chehalis_River_(Washington)&oldid=1200815384"