Talk:Chelsea Lawson
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Nice to see this page
editThank You for making this page. It looks good, and it is nice to see Chelsea having her own page. I hope this trend continues to other characters who have been on the show longer than she has and warrant their own page even more :) Allukka (talk) 19:28, 25 July 2012 (UTC)
- You're very welcome. I know we're all trying to make pages as long as they fit WP:V and WP:NOTABILITY. MusicFreak7676 TALK! 19:34, 25 July 2012 (UTC)
- Also, the picture of Melissa Claire Egan is very nice. The pictures you have uploaded recently have been top-notch. Allukka (talk) 09:24, 4 August 2012 (UTC)
- Thank you. I pride myself on them. Musicfreak7676 my talk page! 19:45, 4 August 2012 (UTC)
- Also, the picture of Melissa Claire Egan is very nice. The pictures you have uploaded recently have been top-notch. Allukka (talk) 09:24, 4 August 2012 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Chelsea Lawson. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130816041951/http://daytimeconfidential.zap2it.com:80/2013/08/13/come-on-down-for-a-family-feud-on-the-young-and-the-restless-promo to http://daytimeconfidential.zap2it.com/2013/08/13/come-on-down-for-a-family-feud-on-the-young-and-the-restless-promo
- Corrected formatting/usage for http://emmyonline.org/day_41st_nominations
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:35, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 5 external links on Chelsea Lawson. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120604041429/http://www.theyoungandtherestless.com/2012/01/catherine-bach-daisy-duke-joins-yr.php to http://www.theyoungandtherestless.com/2012/01/catherine-bach-daisy-duke-joins-yr.php
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20121129171748/http://daytimeconfidential.zap2it.com/2012/11/26/sharon-and-chelsea-go-toe-to-toe-over-adam-on-the-young-and-the-restless to http://daytimeconfidential.zap2it.com/2012/11/26/sharon-and-chelsea-go-toe-to-toe-over-adam-on-the-young-and-the-restless
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20121227221439/http://daytimeconfidential.zap2it.com/2012/12/10/daytime-confidentials-top-10-soap-opera-couples-of-2012?page=0%2C7 to http://daytimeconfidential.zap2it.com/2012/12/10/daytime-confidentials-top-10-soap-opera-couples-of-2012?page=0%2C7
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130721011426/http://daytimeconfidential.zap2it.com/2013/03/13/a-good-fake-man-is-hard-to-find-on-the-young-and-the-restless to http://daytimeconfidential.zap2it.com/2013/03/13/a-good-fake-man-is-hard-to-find-on-the-young-and-the-restless
- Corrected formatting/usage for http://daytimeconfidential.zap2it.com/2013/08/13/come-on-down-for-a-family-feud-on-the-young-and-the-restless-promo
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:59, 4 August 2017 (UTC)
Chelsea's "marriage" to Calvin
editGiven the resurrection/return of Adam, Chelsea's marriage to Calvin is legally invalid. Soaps tend to ignore this kind of fact — however, given Adam's return, her relationship (a.k.a. marriage) is invalid, as Adam is legally alive. Plus, including year(s) is purely fan-driven as their "wedding date" was never revealed. livelikemusic talk! 01:39, 7 July 2019 (UTC)
- That's just not true! Anyone who looks it up can and will see that... once one spouse is declared dead... the other is free and clear! Chelsea's marriage to Calvin is 100% legal because, at the time she married him... Adam was dead! Legally dead. He had been declared dead! Chelsea was legally single and no "coming back to life" changes that.2605:8D80:400:C4E0:2524:562A:683B:BDE8 (talk) 09:47, 7 July 2019 (UTC)
- Wouldn't the marriage be classified as invalid and placed under spouse but with the word "invalid" or "void" next to it? This is the first time that I have seen "civil partner" used in the context of a marriage being invalidated after somebody returns from the dead. @Livelikemusic:Arjoccolenty (talk) 14:21, 8 July 2019 (UTC)