Wikipedia

Talk:Cheltenham, Victoria

Latest comment: 7 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

There's an error of fact in the article's History section (3rd para) re 1230 Nepean Highway. The building wasn't constructed for the City of Kingston. It was, if I recall correctly, the Fujitsu headquarters. Council later leased space within the building, moving their headquarters from Mentone to Cheltenham. Reference [5] is Councils announcement that it had bought the building in late 2010.

I suspect the error has arisen from Council's dot points on its web page where it notes the building was built in 1993, then the next dot point that it was 100% leased to Council. I believe this either relates to immediately prior to the purchase or that it is 100% occupied by Council after the purchase. It wasn't the case when it was the Fujitsu building. This article suggests they will be leasing space privately ([1]).

I suggest that the reference simply be that the Council purchased the building in 2010 as its headquarters.

(Apologies for any errors in protocol in using and laying out this page - I'm relatively new at this)

Cheltenham3192 (talk) 00:55, 1 May 2011 (UTC)Reply

Hi Cheltenham3192! I'm so glad your based in Chelt, just like me :) Before the council, as you say 'purchased' the building in 2010-11 the council did still have its municipal office inside the building, Fijitsu did not occupy the whole building. And, the building just happened to be built in the same year or so, the City of Kingston was formed. If that helps in any way...-- MelbourneStar☆ (talk to me) 02:55, 1 May 2011 (UTC)Reply
Hi MelbourneStar. Yes agree. I will change the text. Cheltenham3192 (talk)

New Section - Activity Centre

edit
Latest comment: 13 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I will be soon adding in to the Cheltenham artcile, Cheltenhams' Activity Centre development, which is 1 of 82 major urban developments taking place in Victoria. These are from Melbourne 2030. Suburbs including Mentone, Highett and Mordiollic have their own "Major Activity Centre" as well. Westfield Southland is reguarded itself, as a "Principal Activity Centre" which is higher ranked than a M.A.C. Information is mainly used from the City of Kingston's website ---> http://www.kingston.vic.gov.au/Page/page.asp?Page_Id=1844&h=0 Questions or queiries, feel free to ask me at my talk page :) -- MelbourneStar☆ (talk) 11:54, 3 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

edit
Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 4 external links on Cheltenham, Victoria. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 09:07, 7 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit
Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 5 external links on Cheltenham, Victoria. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 19:48, 9 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit
Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 14 external links on Cheltenham, Victoria. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:52, 10 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit
Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Cheltenham, Victoria. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:54, 21 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit
Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Cheltenham, Victoria. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:13, 4 August 2017 (UTC)Reply

  1. ^ http://www.realestatesource.com.au/council-adjusts-to-being-landlord-snaring-apt-as-tenant.html
Add topic
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Cheltenham,_Victoria&oldid=1200818108"