Talk:Chemical & Engineering News

Latest comment: 1 year ago by GreaterPonce665 in topic move to PR division and regaining editorial independence

Untitled

edit

This article reads like someone from the PR department of C & EN has written it. Not neutral at all. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 192.76.7.196 (talk) 08:52, 29 February 2012 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Chemical & Engineering News. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 10:35, 16 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

move to PR division and regaining editorial independence

edit

Should this drama have some mention on this page? Let me know any opinions. Kiran_891 (TALK) 01:43, 15 April 2023 (UTC)Reply