Talk:Chemical imaging
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Untitled
editA discussion of new techniques is an important part of the process of developing both the technique and its novel applications. This entry needs additional in line references to substantiate claims and also illustrate the state-of-the-science.Nu 18:10, 25 April 2009 (UTC)Bci2Nu 18:10, 25 April 2009 (UTC)25 April, 2009, 1:11 PM (UCT):{{ WP-PHYS}}
Further Reading Section
editIt seems to me that this section needs to go. Wikipedia is not meant to be a list of papers on a given topic. Do all of these papers REALLY contribute to the article? This list is longer than the article itself. While I appreciate the effort it took to put this list together, I don't think it should be. -75.52.164.178 (talk) 20:17, 19 July 2009 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Chemical imaging. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Corrected formatting/usage for http://opticalengineering.spiedigitallibrary.org/article.aspx?articleid=1743003
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110726171326/http://www.photonik.de/index.php?id=11&np=5&artid=848&L=1 to http://www.photonik.de/index.php?id=11&np=5&artid=848&L=1
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:42, 4 August 2017 (UTC)