Talk:Chemical looping combustion

Recent news

Ohio State University Office of Energy and Environment announced January 19, 2013 Successful 200+ Hour Continuous Operation of Coal-Direct Chemical Looping Combustion Technology. It's a 25 kWth sub-pilot plant, but according to the press release, there is funded follow-on study work, in parnership with Babcock and Wilcox Power Generation Group, toward a commercial 550 MWe power plant based on the process.

I think this is a significant development, but haven't tried to edit it into the article. I didn't see an easy place to add it without breaking the flow of what's there. So I'll leave that job to bolder editor. Agnostic Engineer (talk) 08:02, 25 March 2013 (UTC)

Issue of Thermal Efficiency

I don't understand how chemical looping was supposed to enhance efficiency of power plants. I understand reversibility and the efficiency of quasi-isentropic processes, but I don't see how the oxidation and reduction reactions of chemical looping could possibly be quasi-isentropic. The thermal energy liberated in combustion by chemical looping is the same as the energy liberated in straight combustion; the fact that it's liberated at a lower temperature is irrelevant.

To get more work output from the same amount of fuel in any heat engine, the only possibilities are to operate at a higher source-to-sink temperature delta, or to somehow use the potential energy in the fuel to pump heat. But the latter would require a below-ambient process step where thermal energy was obtained from the ambient environment. There is no such step in the process shown.

The paragraph explaining the initial intent for achieving higher efficiency is referenced, and I don't question that there was indeed a paper suggesting that chemical looping could do that. However the referenced paper is not online, and I don't have access to a library that would have hardcopy. It's possible that I'm misunderstanding something, but it would be nice if somebody with access to the paper could review it and clarify the paragraph that cites it. Agnostic Engineer (talk) 21:43, 3 January 2014 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Chemical looping combustion. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110706090413/http://www.chemical-looping.at/ to http://www.chemical-looping.at/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:44, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

Equations 1-2

It seems to me that the givin Redox Equations dont add up at all but i have little knowledge of this topic so i'll just leave it here 94.134.112.19 (talk) 11:01, 8 August 2021 (UTC)