Talk:Chemotaxonomy
Latest comment: 17 years ago by Delta Tango in topic Jeffrey Harborne
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
Cleanup
editThis article obviously needs some cleanup. Take a look at this diff, most of the content is from this edit, before this it was a stub. I'll put a cleanup tag on this article, when it looks okay, remove the tag. Delta Tango • Talk 06:18, 20 December 2006 (UTC)
- I've moved the above mentioned addition to a separate talk page. Articles really shouldn't be in the form of study notes, but it can still be used to help expand the article. See Talk:Chemotaxonomy/Temp. I'm removing the cleanup tag and stubbing the article. Delta Tango • Talk 06:45, 20 December 2006 (UTC)
Jeffrey Harborne
editWhat makes Jeffrey Harborne especially significant for Chemotaxonomy? How come "See also" links to the article about him? Delta Tango • Talk 06:50, 20 December 2006 (UTC)
I agree with your observation. Also, John Griffith Vaughan was cited as "one of the pioneers of chemotaxonomy". Browsing through his entry here on Wikipedia, there has been no mention of him being a said pioneer. The person who created this entry needs more explaining to do. Animeronin 15:31, 24 September 2007 (UTC)