This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
In the History part there is one-sided expression which is unsuitable for Wikipedia. Moreover, is it aproppriate to use the word probably when it is unknown; this is not a historiy, it is a medium.
I gave some references in order to satisfy Wikipedia standards. I don't have any idea how to make the article better, since there aren't other known views on the history. Which is the one-sided expression you mentioned? --Georgi stankov (talk) 19:31, 6 June 2010 (UTC)