Talk:Cherry Ripe (numbers station)

United States Territories Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States Territories, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Territories of the United States on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United States TerritoriesWikipedia:WikiProject United States TerritoriesTemplate:WikiProject United States TerritoriesUnited States Territories articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Radio Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Radio, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Radio-related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.RadioWikipedia:WikiProject RadioTemplate:WikiProject RadioRadio articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

To-do List:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Create: Missing years and articles in radio, National Association of Radio Distress-Signalling and Infocommunications (Hungary)
Assess : Unassessed Radio articles; Unknown-importance Radio articles
Cleanup : Radio articles needing attention
Expand : Midweek Politics Bob Crane
Maintain : Portal:Radio
Stubs : Expand: Radio stubs
Verify : Unreferenced BLPs
Other : Collaboration of the Week:
Requests for Radio peer review:

Radio Stations Low‑importance

	Radio portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Radio Stations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of radio stations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Radio StationsWikipedia:WikiProject Radio StationsTemplate:WikiProject Radio StationsRadio station articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

References

Latest comment: 14 years ago7 comments4 people in discussion

Another editor removed the {{notability}} template from this article, stating, without providing further details, that this "topic is notable enough to be covered in several books and magazines". Google Books doesn't indicate that there is any significant coverage (see this book search), nor does the Google News archive (see this news archive search). I am reinserting the tag and requesting that it not be removed unless someone provides evidence that the article meets the notability guidelines. ^Bongo_matic 14:55, 23 May 2010 (UTC)Reply

In response to a query on the editor's talk page, the editor replied:

This has appeared in the Enigma newsletter, (and Enigma control list 22) and the numbers and oddities newsletter. Also Popular Communications). Graeme Bartlett (talk) 08:12, 24 May 2010 (UTC)Reply

I don't see how this demonstrates that the subject meets the inclusion guidelines. Any views? ^Bongo_matic 09:11, 24 May 2010 (UTC)Reply

Also, the citation to the "book" is published by a publisher whose stated philosophy is to wrap Internet content, such as Wikipedia content, as books. This cannot be considered to be a reliable source based solely on its existence. ^Bongo_matic 01:02, 25 May 2010 (UTC)Reply

I think if we're going to remove this page we need to merge it into the article on Lincolnshire Poacher. Commissarusa (talk) 03:24, 5 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

Well I think we should keep this article, as the topic is in real published magazines like Monitoring Times. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 07:12, 5 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

The subject is well known in shortwave listening circles, including the publications already mentioned. Because a WP editor has never heard of it doesn't mean it lacks notability. Relevant references from these would be useful to work into the article and settle the issue. I oppose deletion but support the idea of merging into the Lincolnshire Poacher page, possibly into the numbers station page itself. Geogene (talk) 01:29, 6 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

If this station was being broadcast out of humpty doo then it would have been broadcast from the humpty doo transmitting station which is actually operated by the Royal Australian Navy. Given Australia is a member of 5 eyes it is likely that the Australian Secret Intelligence Service were acting on behalf of SIS. OK so I edited it. ASIS, SIS, CIA, NZSIS etc. It's all five eyes. MI6 don't operate on Australian soil. ASIS would be the correct operator on behalf of five eyes/MI6/SIS and whatnot.

Add topic