Talk:Cherry Valentine/GA1

Latest comment: 1 year ago by Sammi Brie in topic GA Review

GA Review

edit

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


GA toolbox
Reviewing

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Sammi Brie (talk · contribs) 07:52, 15 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

Thank you for reviewing. I believe I've addressed your concerns below. One thing: I cannot access the Guardian piece to know how the article's text should possibly be modified. Are you able to make a quick change, or share the Guardian text for comparative purposes? Please let me know if anything else is needed here. Thanks again! ---Another Believer (Talk) 14:14, 15 January 2023 (UTC)Reply
@Another Believer, if you mean the Telegraph piece, just check Earwig which has the text. Sammi Brie (she/her • tc) 21:05, 15 January 2023 (UTC)Reply
There is also one other thing to check: Metro. If you're using it just for pronouns, looks like this Vulture piece also has the he/they mentions and is more reliable. Sammi Brie (she/her • tc) 21:07, 15 January 2023 (UTC)Reply
@Sammi Brie Oh, thanks! I made these minor changes and linked "came out" to Coming out. ---Another Believer (Talk) 21:17, 15 January 2023 (UTC)Reply
@Another Believer Looks good. See my suggestion to replace the Metro source with Vulture. Sammi Brie (she/her • tc) 21:20, 15 January 2023 (UTC)Reply
@Sammi Brie   Done diff ---Another Believer (Talk) 21:30, 15 January 2023 (UTC)Reply
GA review
(see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose, spelling, and grammar):  
    b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):  
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references):  
    b (citations to reliable sources):  
    c (OR):  
    d (copyvio and plagiarism):  
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):  
    b (focused):  
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:  
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):  
    b (appropriate use with suitable captions):  

Overall:
Pass/Fail:  

  ·   ·   ·  

No serious issues. Might want to tweak a bit of phrasing in one passage. There are some copy edits, and I'll also teach you about table captions while we're here. No issues beyond that; should not take long, Another Believer. Sammi Brie (she/her • tc) 07:52, 15 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

Wonderful, thanks! ---Another Believer (Talk) 14:47, 15 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

Copy changes

edit

Sourcing and spot checks

edit

Earwig turned up no issues. The largest-percentage sources mostly flag work titles and such banal phrases as "was eliminated in the second episode". I do wonder if Ward came out by writing a letter to his parents before running away from home for a week, after which his parents individually took him for a drive and talked but did not discuss his sexual orientation after that incident. could be rephrased slightly to bring it a little further from the Telegraph source.

There are five Headbomb-highlighted sources. One is a video from the BBC (geoblocked, I note). Three are primary sources (music videos and an ABOUTSELF Instagram post). The fifth is from Metro, generally unreliable. Is there a better source than Metro?

Five sources were chosen for spot checks:

  • 2: The Telegraph obituary is used five times and checks out for claims such as the mechanic career and lip-sync with Tayce.  Y
  • 12: Official listing of an event shows Cherry Valentine as being on the tour.  Y
  • 18: BBC News obituary gives date of death and death age.  Y
  • 26: The reference is the music video in this case.
  • 27: NME article on "Good Ones" video.  Y

Other items

edit
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.