This article is within the scope of WikiProject Veterinary medicine, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Veterinary medicine on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Veterinary medicineWikipedia:WikiProject Veterinary medicineTemplate:WikiProject Veterinary medicineVeterinary medicine articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Dogs, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Canidae and commonly referred to as "dogs" and of which the domestic dog is but one of its many members, on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DogsWikipedia:WikiProject DogsTemplate:WikiProject DogsDogs articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cats. This project provides a central approach to Cat-related subjects on Wikipedia. Please participate by editing the article, and help us assess and improve articles to good and 1.0 standards, or visit the wikiproject page for more details.CatsWikipedia:WikiProject CatsTemplate:WikiProject CatsCats articles
Latest comment: 18 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
On Sat. morning my vet diagnosed my Cocker Spaniel with Cherry Eye. On Sunday there was no sign of the cherry eye. Is it possible for the gland to retract back in the third eyelid or was he mis-diagnosed?
Latest comment: 17 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Move from article:
NOTE(The official book of the Neapolitan mastiff Auth: Dr Sherilyn k. Allen)suggests that, removal of the cherry eye in the neapolitan mastiff, is unlikely to cause dry eyes and Tucking the gland in this breed, will inevitably lead to it returning....and as a former breeder myself of this breed, I agree 100% with my own personal experiences.
Latest comment: 16 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Hello all...
An image used in the article, specifically Image:Bulldog with cherry eye.jpg, has a little bit of a licensing issue. The image was uploaded back when the rules around image uploading were less restrictive. It is presumed that the uploader was willing to license the picture under the GFDL license but was not clear in that regard. As such, the image, while not at risk of deletion, is likely not clearly licensed to allow for free use in any future use of this article. If anyone has an image that can replace this, or can go take one and upload it, it would be best.