Talk:Cheshire Cat (Blink-182 album)/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Mebored81 (talk · contribs) 16:53, 3 March 2013 (UTC)

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

---

I thoroughly enjoyed reading the article and think its tone it perfect.

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

   Few minor wording issues.

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

   Can different sources be included? Only 2 books sourced for whole article.

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

   Reads too much like a biography of the band instead of focusing just on the album. Also no reference to broad range of reviews of album

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

   On hold for 7 days. The lead section is too long. Needs to stick to the key information about the album. Also needs to remove some of the biographical detail and stick to information about the album. Also some different references would make the article stronger.