Talk:ChesterBus

Statements in the main like Arriva "bullying Council operators", "Arriva jumped the gun and illegally registered services..." and "...as happened in Warrington, where thankfully, they failed" indicate possible bias. --Unremitting 17:24, 8 February 2007 (UTC)

It does seem a bit POV. I have cn'ed the word "illegally" and will remove it soon if someone doesn't respond with an appropriate reference. My understanding is that since deregulation, operators can register what they like, where they like. If this is challenged, and deemed to be "abuse of a monopoly position" or some such, then they can be removed. To justify calling it illegal, reference is needed to a successful injunction or similar against Arriva, if such exists. Even then, the whole paragraph could probably do with a rewrite to be encyclopedic in tone. Quackdave 14:50, 11 February 2007 (UTC)

Having done a bit more research, I have now completely rewritten the paragraph in a more encyclopedic, NPOV tone. I could not find any record of a judgement in the court case, so have not speculated as to the reason for the deregistrations; I have just put everything chronologically with links. Quackdave 17:27, 11 February 2007 (UTC)

Merge proposal

Broadly speaking I would agree that most of the current content should be merged into First Chester & The Wirral. However I do believe there may be scope for a separate article dealing with Chester City Transport prior to its sale. Perhaps at present there isn't enough material to justify this, in which case a full merge could go ahead, with the potential for historical CCT content to be split back out at a future date.

There appear to be a couple of slight discrepancies between the routes added to First Chester & The Wirral and those remaining at ChesterBus which could do with checking out before the table is removed from the latter article. (I'm not sure whether more routes have been discarded recently, or whether they've been accidentally omitted from the merge.)

Quackdave (talk) 21:13, 25 March 2008 (UTC)

I also agree that merger would be the best way forward at the moment. I suggest a redirect replaces this article, which would allow a future article to be spun off from First Chester & The Wirral if sufficient historical material about ChesterBus is added to justify a separate article at that time. Until then, have its historical stuff in a section of First Chester & The Wirral.  DDStretch  (talk) 22:11, 25 March 2008 (UTC)

Agree. If a historical article did come into being then it would probably be best named as Chester City Transport given that this was both the limited company name post 1986 as well as the trading name used prior to ChesterBus. Divy (talk) 10:20, 26 March 2008 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 6 external links on ChesterBus. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071026172034/http://www.busandcoach.com/newsStory.aspx?id=954 to http://www.busandcoach.com/newsstory.aspx?id=954
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140812175625/http://www.busandcoach.com/newspage.aspx?id=991&categoryid=0 to http://www.busandcoach.com/newspage.aspx?id=991&categoryid=0
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.vosa.gov.uk/vosacorp/repository/CONT066854.pdf
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140812175700/http://www.busandcoach.com/newspage.aspx?id=1039&categoryid=0 to http://www.busandcoach.com/newspage.aspx?id=1039&categoryid=0
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.vosa.gov.uk/vosacorp/repository/CONT068059.pdf
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.firstgroup.com/ukbus/northwest/chesterwirral/news/?item=1816&show=1

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:12, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on ChesterBus. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://archive.is/20140803121624/http://www.firstgroup.com/latest_news/?id=000040 to http://www.firstgroup.com/latest_news/?id=000040
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140812175615/http://www.busandcoach.com/newspage.aspx?id=1414&categoryid=0 to http://www.busandcoach.com/newspage.aspx?id=1414&categoryid=0

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:28, 4 August 2017 (UTC)