Talk:Chesterfield, Derbyshire/GA1

Latest comment: 13 years ago by 12george1 in topic GA Review

GA Review

edit

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: 12george1 (talk) 02:22, 31 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

General
  • Look for any place in the article that is missing citations, there is so many that I cannot list all of them here.
Lead
  • Wikilink England, miles, and km.
    •   Done
History
  • It looks like you split the first and second incorrectly, since you have information about the 1204 charter split up.
Borough council
Economy
Town centre (under "Shopping, entertainment and leisure")
The Pavements (under "Shopping, entertainment and leisure")
  • "Queens park is a popular attraction where you can go swimming diving, gymnastics and tennis it does have a park as well with a train for the little kids to go one and there is also a boating lake." - This sounds like an advertisement.
Sports and leisure
References
  • Several references are just bare URLs and/or not in the CiteWeb or CiteNews, and also missing information like the author, publisher, date, and accessdates. Those references are: #1, #14-#27, #30-#35, #37, and #39-#59.
Since you did not address or fix the problem I had with the lead (shortness; in agreement with Bob Castle's suggestion) and references, I have no choice but to fail this nomination. I gave you a week and a half to fix this, but it was not fixed/addressed. You may try again later when these outstanding issues have been fixed.--12george1 (talk) 00:13, 11 April 2011 (UTC)Reply
Non-reviewer comments

Please don't link England, miles and km.--BelovedFreak 08:25, 31 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

The lead paragraph needs to summarise the content of the article - ideally, they should be at least two paragraphs long. Bob talk 09:48, 31 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

Date formats need to be consistent in the references section there are, day first, month first & ISO formats at the moment. Keith D (talk) 12:24, 31 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

I've made some copyedits on errors and corrected some things. RcsprinterGimme a message 09:42, 3 April 2011 (UTC)Reply

I just need you to make sure there are citations throughout the article, and also revise the article per Bob and Keith D's suggestions.--12george1 (talk) 20:17, 3 April 2011 (UTC)Reply

Good work

edit

This article is looking good. Well done. If you need to meet to discuss then you know about this. Victuallers (talk) 00:12, 3 April 2011 (UTC)Reply