Wikipedia

Talk:Cheyenne Mountain

Latest comment: 7 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified
Learn more about this page

Cheyenne Mountain article discussion

edit
Latest comment: 9 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Please see the Talk:Colorado Springs, Colorado#Cheyenne Mountain (related to Cheyenne Canon) posting about the different Cheyenne Mountain articles.--CaroleHenson (talk) 22:38, 30 January 2015 (UTC)Reply

Cheyenne Canyon

edit
Latest comment: 9 years ago3 comments1 person in discussion
  Moved from Talk:Colorado Springs, Colorado § Cheyenne Canyon

Hi,

I've been working on articles about Colorado Springs and the area and I've seen the global Cheyenne Canon, Cheyenne Canyon terms used, but no article. There are articles for:

My questions are:

  • Should there be a single approach for use of Cañon, Canon or Canyon?
  • Should there be some something to tie these together (e.g., Cheyenne Canon article, bring this together in a Cheyenne Mountain article)?
  • Any changes to the approach where one article is about the park - and the other about the canyon?

It seemed like this would have the larger audience, but I'll post something on the article talk pages to refer to this discussion. (By the way, I also just created Cheyenne Creek.)

Any insight would be great! I'm happy to do the work, I just need help with approach.--CaroleHenson (talk) 22:25, 30 January 2015 (UTC)Reply

Here's a thought, since the South Cheyenne Canon article is short:
How does that sound? (See a start of a summary at Cheyenne Mountain#Cheyenne Cañon). Thanks!--CaroleHenson (talk) 21:24, 1 February 2015 (UTC)Reply
Well, I'm pretty much talking to myself on this one, but just to explain my logic if anyone is reading: It seemed to make sense to just keep the Cheyenne Cañon summary on the Cheyenne Mountain page - rather than creating a Cheyenne Cañon page by changing the South Cheyenne Cañon article. I renamed the South Cheyenne Canon article to Cañon, to be consistent with the North Cheyenne Cañon Park article.--CaroleHenson (talk) 10:19, 2 February 2015 (UTC)Reply

Cheyenne Mountain (related to Cheyenne Canon)

edit
Latest comment: 9 years ago12 comments4 people in discussion
  Moved from Talk:Colorado Springs, Colorado § Cheyenne Mountain (related to Cheyenne Canon)

In addition, there are the following articles about Cheyenne Mountain:

Questions:

  • I've never seen an article with the name "massif" in it, but shouldn't the Cheyenne Mountain redirect to the massif article rather than the nuclear bunker?
  • Is Cheyenne Mountain massif a good/correct title?
  • Cheyenne Mountain Highway is really more of a road up to the Shrine and Zoo... should it be included in the Cheyenne Mountain (massif / no massif) article?
  • Isn't the Cheyenne Mountain nuclear bunker related to North American Aerospace Defense Command (NORAD) article?

Thanks so much! Again, I'll post a message on the article talk pages to look at this discussion. I'm happy to do the work, I just need help with approach.--CaroleHenson (talk) 22:34, 30 January 2015 (UTC)Reply

Here's a stab:
  • I've removed the redirect from "Cheyenne Mountain" to "Cheyenne Mountain nuclear bunker",
changing it to "Cheyenne Mountain massif" for now (updated per another discussion about blanking a redirect)--CaroleHenson (talk) 18:05, 31 January 2015 (UTC)Reply
  • It seems clear that "Cheyenne Mountain massif" should be moved to "Cheyenne Mountain". So, I'll ask for an administrative move to the previous redirect
  • I don't know if the nuclear bunker should be merged with NORAD or not
Any thoughts about this? Thanks!--CaroleHenson (talk) 04:52, 31 January 2015 (UTC)Reply

- - -

Back in Wikipedia's early days (on 20 May 2003), an editor started this first version of the article titled Cheyenne Mountain. It was a good first start. There should probably be a delineation of where the nature parks are in relation to NORAD, and where one can go hiking without being arrested for trespassing.

Things seem to have gone off the rails sometime after that, especially after this move:

I don't know what the basis was for deciding that the nuclear bunker was the WP:primary topic over all of the other topics on the set index (disambiguation) page. Clearly it is not, and I don't think there is a clear primary topic. The message at Template:Dabprimary is apt. We should have a WP:broad concept article at the base Cheyenne Mountain title, which gives a broad overview of everything on, under, above and nearby the "mountain". – Wbm1058 (talk) 18:22, 31 January 2015 (UTC)Reply

Hi, yes. I have spent 2-3 weeks so far cleaning up Colorado articles with erroneous information, cited sources that don't provide the article content, cited sources that don't even mention the subject, use of names of places and streets from 1898 and other early directories that are now called something else, and sometimes blatant lies - from one user.
The Cheyenne Mountain article wasn't a bad start for an article about the military component, but is not about Cheyenne Mountain as a whole. I've started working on clean up of what was in Cheyenne Mountain massif - now in Cheyenne Mountain - and will work on expanding upon the article.
The ridiculousness has been amazing - like having a redirect from Cheyenne Mountain to the Cheyenne Mountain nuclear bunker article (i.e., just one of many).--CaroleHenson (talk) 18:56, 31 January 2015 (UTC)Reply
The worst part is that this content gets copied and perpetuated across the internet. Regarding scope of the Cheyenne Mountain article: If you've seen any of the other articles I've cleaned up The Broadmoor is one of the recent ones, I'm very thorough and will cover the recreational + residential + military aspects of Cheyenne Mountain.--CaroleHenson (talk) 19:03, 31 January 2015 (UTC)Reply
Right, OK. I vaguely recall running into this topic before and noticing some obsessive level of detail some places. Just keep in mind that the POV of a resident of the area, who knows there are parks and zoos, is different from someone who lives outside the state, and thus equates the mountain with just the military operations there. The military and civilian uses need to be put in context, I'm hoping you can do that. Regards, Wbm1058 (talk) 19:10, 31 January 2015 (UTC)Reply
Yep, will do. That's what I meant by covering recreational + residential + military aspects.--CaroleHenson (talk) 19:13, 31 January 2015 (UTC)Reply

Merger of Cheyenne Mountain / Cheyenne Mountain (disambiguation)

edit

Since there is only one Cheyenne Mountain, that makes sense to me. I am still in the process of expanding the Cheyenne Mountain article, and the items directly related to Cheyenne Mountain are included in the article. I have asked for comments here: Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Disambiguation#Two Colorado disambiguation pages.--CaroleHenson (talk) 04:01, 1 February 2015 (UTC)Reply

edit
Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Cheyenne Mountain. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:40, 21 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit
Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Cheyenne Mountain. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:50, 4 August 2017 (UTC)Reply

Add topic
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Cheyenne_Mountain&oldid=1200380716"