Talk:Chichibu Railway 6000 series

Have a proposition

The series articles for Chichibu Railway are too short to constitute a distinct piece, then I offer to unify them into one article.--A Japanologist (talk) 10:02, 3 May 2010 (UTC)

There are broken links

Should be removed the unnecessary link. If you want provide a link, make the page that the link represents.--A Japanologist (talk) 04:45, 4 May 2010 (UTC)

If you are referring to the two (currently) red links to Seibu 101 series and Seibu 10000 series, then you should read the guidelines, which say: "In general, a red link should be allowed to remain in an article if it links to a term that could plausibly sustain an article, but for which there exists no candidate article, or article section, under any name." As these are both links to articles that are likely to be created in the near future, there is no problem here. --DAJF (talk) 05:33, 4 May 2010 (UTC)

DAJF!

Read the section of Avoiding creation of certain types of red links in Wipedia:Red link.

You had better not make red link without reason.--A Japanologist (talk) 14:26, 4 May 2010 (UTC)

I have read it. It says "Do not create red links to articles that will never be created". Why do you think the article for Seibu 101 series will never be created? It is a major EMU type operated by Seibu, and I personally intend to create an article in the near future, so there's really no need to be so concerned about it. --DAJF (talk) 14:33, 4 May 2010 (UTC)

OK, then make a article in a few days. Improve the each shining hour! Good by.--A Japanologist (talk) 14:40, 4 May 2010 (UTC)