Talk:Chief Advisor of Bhutan

Latest comment: 5 years ago by DBigXray in topic Requested move 19 September 2018

Redirect

edit

User:PRehse Please note as explained by User:BukhariSaeed here Talk:Chief_Adviser#Disambiguation this deserves a separate article. let me know if you have any opposition. regards. --DBigXray 09:12, 17 September 2018 (UTC)Reply

Requested move 19 September 2018

edit
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: Support, Consensus is that Dab is necessary since media uses the alt spelling for both entities.(non-admin closure) DBigXray 11:47, 4 October 2018 (UTC)Reply



Chief AdvisorChief Advisor of Bhutan – The post title is relevant to Bhutan country. Devopam (talk) 12:08, 19 September 2018 (UTC) --Relisting. Dreamy Jazz 🎷 talk to me | my contributions 21:33, 26 September 2018 (UTC)Reply

@BukhariSaeed:, I didn't do it directly , as I wanted to have a consensus. Now, my suggestion was purely based on linguistic usage and not really about disambiguation. This is an official position in the state of Bhutan, hence the primary name of article might include so. I think it is advisable to move both (the Bangladesh one and this) or none , to keep uniform nomenclature. Devopam (talk) 18:13, 19 September 2018 (UTC)Reply
Devopam did you check the policy WP:SMALLDETAILS I linked above ? your opinion of adding a disambiguation is in direct conflict with the policy. in such a case we have to follow the policy as they are based on a larger consensus and not on a single person's opinion. --DBigXray 18:34, 19 September 2018 (UTC)Reply
hi User:DBigXray, I did go through your suggestion above, and WP:UCRN, WP:CRITERIA. Per my understanding, I believe I asked for the right thing, and presented here for larger community to understand. A 'Chief Adviser' designation/title may be only well understood in that particular country, but it is a generic term in corporate hierarchy including many others. Hence for clear understanding I suggested the name change with country name appended. And thanks to User:BukhariSaeed, got both the country pages that should be moved. We can always have a redirect with the shorter name so that residents of that country can also search. Devopam (talk) 05:30, 20 September 2018 (UTC)Reply
I understand your opinion, but kindly understand that Policy of WP:CONCISE and  WP:SMALLDETAILS are based on a much larger consensus and they trump individual likeness. Your suggestion is totally against the policies I quoted.--DBigXray 09:59, 20 September 2018 (UTC)Reply
  • Support Although the number of such sources is a matter of discussion, but the fact that some of the major sources use it both ways, so I have changed my !vote in support. Closing as move. --DBigXray 11:47, 4 October 2018 (UTC)Reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.