Talk:Chief Financial Officers Act
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
Untitled
editI have moved the following stuff from the article page. Please clean it up before moving any of it back. (See Wikipedia:Policies and guidelines#Content guidelines - dcljr 05:35, 10 Jan 2005 (UTC)
Articles I would like written High Priority:
Lower Priority, but good to have:
Key words:
From the testimony of Susan Gaffney, inspector General of HUD: ... Nowhere in these broad purposes does the CFO Act list obtaining an unqualified opinion, yet this has become the one measure that is pointed to frequently as a measure of success in improving agencies’ financial management..... US Government Agencies not covered under the CFO ActeditThe Department of Homeland Security (DHS) is exempt from the CFO Act. From Spurning the CFO Act by Roy Harris, CFO Magazine September 08, 2004: The finance chief at the Department of Homeland Security wants "a chance to do things our way." Some think it was just an oversight that the Department of Homeland Security, created two years ago, became the only cabinet-level agency not subject to the CFO Act of 1990..... History of This PageeditThis page grew out of this discussion a thread where I'm trying to convince members of the newsgroup to migrate some of our activity to wiki. |
Further expansion
editHistory of Compliance
editSteinberg, Harold I. Publication: Journal of Accountancy Date: March 1996 Following enactment of the CFO Act, the policies and standards that govern the government's central and agency-based financial systems were revised, various central systems were upgraded or changed and agency systems were consolidated or modernized. Nonetheless, at the end of the 1994 fiscal year, only 34% of the agencies' systems had fully implemented the government's standard general ledger, only 63% had met their agency standards for a computing environment and 55% of the system applications needed to be replaced or upgraded. http://www.allbusiness.com/accounting/methods-standards-generally-accepted-accounting/543111-6.html
Hanks Article
editThe Hanks article is highly opinionated, and apparently written by one who has opposed the CFO Act from the beginning. For objectivity, it should be removed and perhaps replaced by a more objective article, or counterbalanced by the opinion of an author who is in favor the the Act. 64.40.54.46 (talk) 06:37, 25 March 2014 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Chief Financial Officers Act. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150716031850/https://cfo.gov/about-council/ to https://www.cfo.gov/about-council
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:22, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
Display of 24 agencies in columns
editWhy is the col-break where it is in the list of 24 agencies? I tried to edit page to add column headers "Subsection (a)(1) Agencies" and "Subsection (a)(2) Agencies" (you can see in edit that I reverted). But, somehow Wikipedia added a "content box" that messed up the formatting. But, without the headers the current col-break has an undisclosed meaning. - Mrdvt92 (talk) 12:35, 9 June 2021 (UTC)