Talk:Chief of the Air Staff (Pakistan)

Latest comment: 1 year ago by ClydeFranklin in topic Requested move 14 July 2023

A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion

edit

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion:

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 20:51, 21 August 2018 (UTC)Reply

A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion

edit

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 19:06, 15 February 2019 (UTC)Reply

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

edit

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 02:07, 9 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

Requested move 14 July 2023

edit
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) CLYDE TALK TO ME/STUFF DONE 06:34, 13 August 2023 (UTC)Reply


– full official name[1] inline with Vice Chief of the Naval Staff, Deputy Chief of the Naval Staff, Assistant Chief of the Naval Staff 223.123.88.252

full official name[2] inline with Vice Chief of the Air Staff, Deputy Chief of the Air Staff (talk) 20:15, 13 July 2023 (UTC) This is a contested technical request (permalink). Skarmory (talk • contribs) 06:48, 14 July 2023 (UTC) — Relisting. ❯❯❯ Raydann(Talk) 07:57, 21 July 2023 (UTC)Reply

  • Both of these fail WP:COMMONNAME. This is a WP:PCM. If you wish to continue with your request, click the discuss link in your request to begin a formal WP:RM discussion. Once you've done that, or if you do not wish to continue, please remove your request. Thanks! As you are an IP user, this request will be removed in 1 day. - UtherSRG (talk) 20:27, 13 July 2023 (UTC)Reply
    @UtherSRG: i don't think Common Name criteria applies here, Please see Chief of the Air Staff 14 out of 10 contains official name with(the) in titles, and also Pakistan Navy's & Air Force's Second, Third, and Fourth level command posts alredy contains full name with(the) in titles. 223.123.88.183 (talk) 03:47, 14 July 2023 (UTC)Reply
    COMMONNAME should always be considered, and if a request fails to be the common name, it should usually go through a full requested move. It's possible the other articles sren't following COMMONNAME, or consistency could be deemed to be less important than what the most common name is – there's a lot of nuances involved. These moves could also get consensus, just there is basis to oppose, which means it's not uncontroversial. A full requested move may be started using the discuss link above. Skarmory (talk • contribs) 05:13, 14 July 2023 (UTC)Reply
@Skarmory: Kindly also see this, I searched both on Google and it shows 75,000,000 most results of "Chief of the Air Staff Pakistan"[3], and 68,800,000 results of the "Chief of Air Staff Pakistan"[4] now it's clear which one is the common name and plus+ i already provided official name evidence and other Second, Third, Fourth posts articles are also using official names. 223.123.85.101 (talk) 06:14, 14 July 2023 (UTC)Reply
The technical requests section of requested moves is only for uncontroversial requests. This is controversial and has been contested, and I have started a full requested move as such. I make no comment on whether the page should be moved or not. (By the way, those links give me 55,700,000 and 55,600,000 results respectively; raw numbers over about 1,000 are estimates and untrustworthy, and at this scale there are going to be so many false positives anyway that a raw google hit count won't be reliable. Wikipedia:Search engine test is probably worth reading.) Skarmory (talk • contribs) 06:42, 14 July 2023 (UTC)Reply

RM/TR discussion above. Skarmory (talk • contribs) 06:52, 14 July 2023 (UTC)Reply

Note: WikiProject Military history has been notified of this discussion. ❯❯❯ Raydann(Talk) 07:58, 21 July 2023 (UTC)Reply
Note: WikiProject Pakistan has been notified of this discussion. ❯❯❯ Raydann(Talk) 07:58, 21 July 2023 (UTC)Reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.