Talk:Chief of the Defence Staff (France)

Latest comment: 4 years ago by CocoricoPolynesien in topic Sources/General comment

File:Amiral guillaud.jpg Nominated for Deletion

edit
  An image used in this article, File:Amiral guillaud.jpg, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Media without a source as of 26 July 2011
What should I do?
A discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. If you feel the deletion can be contested then please do so (commons:COM:SPEEDY has further information). Otherwise consider finding a replacement image before deletion occurs.

This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 21:22, 26 July 2011 (UTC)Reply

Foch/Petain

edit

The two Petain biographies which I've just consulted (Atkin 1997, Williams 2005) are pretty clear that he continued to be Commander-in-Chief of the French Army after Foch's appointment as Supreme Allied Commander, although there is slight ambiguity over whether it lasted until the peace treaty was signed in June 1919 or until his appointment as Vice-Chairman of the Supreme War Council in January 1920.

The date given for Foch's appointment is a little misleading as well - the Doullens Conference of March 1918 initially appointed him to a purely co-ordinating role, and he was not given a command title until another conference in April (Beauvais iirc). Thereafter his de facto power increased - staff were poached from Petain's GQG to work for Foch's chiefs of staff (Weygand and Desticker), said staff acquired control over railway transportation (giving them far more power over British and American forces than tends to be remembered in Anglo-Saxon accounts) and Petain was told to report to Foch rather than to the French Government. He was still Commander-in-Chief of French forces on the Western Front though.Paulturtle (talk) 18:43, 4 June 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Chief of the Defence Staff (France). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:11, 22 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

edit

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 15:58, 20 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

Sources/General comment

edit

Hello,

On 12 September 2020, legifrance.gouv.fr, the government website hosting the laws and decrees of France was updated. Unfortunately, by doing so, the PDF versions of the decrees nominating at the offices were deleted. As a consequence, all sources between the 50's and the 90's are now dead links. I'm searching for an alternative.

Regards, CocoricoPolynesien (talk) 08:27, 13 September 2020 (UTC)Reply