Talk:Chigua (genus)
 | This page was proposed for deletion by Newmonkeycrew (talk · contribs) on 12 June 2021. |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
Chigua is no more a valid genus
editA recent revision (Lindstrom 2009[1]) sunk the genus Chigua and placed C. restrepoi and C. bernalii in the genus Zamia. It also regarded the two described species of Chigua as being a single entity. --Esculapio (talk) 19:24, 28 November 2011 (UTC)
- Esculapio Careful with the terminology, please. The name is still valid, as the word "valid" is defined in botanical nomenclature, although it is no longer accepted by current authors. The Kew World Checklist agrees that the genus should be merged into Zamia.Joseph Laferriere (talk) 16:31, 12 July 2014 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Chigua. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20050301022859/http://plantnet.rbgsyd.gov.au:80/cgi-bin/taxon.pl?name=Chigua to http://plantnet.rbgsyd.gov.au/cgi-bin/taxon.pl?name=Chigua
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20061228144956/http://www.horticulturalconsultants.com:80/cycad/chigua.html to http://www.horticulturalconsultants.com/cycad/chigua.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:47, 22 November 2016 (UTC)