Talk:Child tax credit

Latest comment: 4 years ago by OpenSourceAdvocate56

My understanding is the ages listed under the TCJA section are incorrect? https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/26/152 indicates a qualifying child is someone under 19 or under 24 if enrolled in college full time? Can someone confirm this for me? — Preceding unsigned comment added by OpenSourceAdvocate56 (talkcontribs) 02:38, 6 May 2020 (UTC)Reply

Untitled

edit

12/22/2009 Changed some numbers for tax year 2009 and also included the alternative way to figure the credit for taxpayers with more than three qualifying children. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.214.106.153 (talk) 19:10, 22 December 2009 (UTC) 7/25/2010 I attempted to improve the quality and generality of the stated arguments for and against. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.53.20.209 (talk) 02:56, 26 July 2010 (UTC)Reply

ACTC claims not checked on ITIN returns

edit

IRS checking of ACTC claims on ITIN returns is dramatically perfunctory. How to mention that here?? Have a link to Tax Credits for Illegal Immigrants I suppose. 67.161.10.103 (talk) 17:03, 2 September 2013 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Child tax credit. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:51, 12 November 2016 (UTC)Reply