Sources "of a commercial nature" not allowed on Wikipedia

edit

Unreliable sources "of a commercial nature" are not all allowed on Wikipedia.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Identifying_reliable_sources#Vendor_and_e-commerce_sources prohibits linking to "Individual web pages that primarily exist to sell products or services".

Please review: WP:QUESTIONABLE, WP:REFSPAM and WP:PROMOTION. Senor Cuete (talk) 14:36, 16 April 2018 (UTC)Reply

There's only one source in the article, and they do not appear to be in the business of selling peppers. What makes you think that they are? Anastrophe (talk) 16:51, 16 April 2018 (UTC)Reply
There were four references and the three I removed were blatantly commercial in nature. Please look at the article history. Senor Cuete (talk) 16:54, 16 April 2018 (UTC)Reply
Great! It would have been helpful to have included that with your comment. Standing alone, it appeared to be a non sequitur. Thanks. Anastrophe (talk) 16:59, 16 April 2018 (UTC)Reply
Actually there were FIVE and four were commercial - my mistake. Senor Cuete (talk) 17:00, 16 April 2018 (UTC)Reply

Reason for removing the "seeds themselves contain no heat" part.

edit

To say that the "seeds themselves contain no heat" is at *best* pedantic and at worst very misleading. It may *technically* be true that the seeds do not *contain* capsaicin... but they are covered in it. The seeds are spicy. If you take the veins out of a dried chile de árbol, but leave the seeds in, it's still way spicier than it would be if you removed both the veins and the seeds. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 207.140.111.60 (talk) 23:10, 17 May 2018 (UTC)Reply