This article is within the scope of WikiProject Arts, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Arts on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArtsWikipedia:WikiProject ArtsTemplate:WikiProject ArtsWikiProject Arts articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Dogs, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Canidae and commonly referred to as "dogs" and of which the domestic dog is but one of its many members, on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DogsWikipedia:WikiProject DogsTemplate:WikiProject DogsDogs articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Internet culture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of internet culture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Internet cultureWikipedia:WikiProject Internet cultureTemplate:WikiProject Internet cultureInternet culture articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Visual arts, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of visual arts on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Visual artsWikipedia:WikiProject Visual artsTemplate:WikiProject Visual artsvisual arts articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Fictional characters, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of fictional characters on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Fictional charactersWikipedia:WikiProject Fictional charactersTemplate:WikiProject Fictional charactersfictional character articles
Latest comment: 9 days ago2 comments2 people in discussion
Tweets from the brands using the meme are used as sources for the post, why should the official artist's Tumblr not be considered a source but brand Twitters are? Avienby (talk) 03:57, 24 November 2024 (UTC)Reply
@Avienby Because they are not WP:SECONDARY sources, and sourcing information using only primary sources does not establish it's notability in the article. I believe that even if you did find a secondary source talking about Bank's merch, it still may violate WP:NOTPROMO, but it depends on how well its neutrally phrased. Oh, and you're completely right that using a brand's own tweet/reel/post would be a primary source as well, which for some reason I wasn't thinking about. I'm removing that information now. Thanks for the heads up, and cheers from another fan of chill guy 🙂 Johnson52405:24, 24 November 2024 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 3 days ago2 comments2 people in discussion
Hello @Royiswariii: I hope you are well 🙂 I see you added an unreliable sources tag on the page, and I wanted to ask you about your reasoning for doing so so I can fix the issue and remove the tag. The source in question on BlueSky was made by the author of the artwork, and comments on the one mistake he saw on this specific Wikipedia page, being that his artwork wasn't based on anything like it was reported. I wouldn't consider this statement an "exceptional claim" that would violate WP:ABOUTSELF, but what do you think? Especially since the author made this comment on BlueSky as a way to help clarify some incorrect information on how he made his art, I think it's important to be kept, but if you still disagree I can remove it. Cheers! Johnson52407:18, 30 November 2024 (UTC)Reply