 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Requested move
edit- The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
Page moved. Vegaswikian (talk) 20:28, 29 August 2011 (UTC)
Chilöe Wigeon → Chiloe Wigeon – I believe discritic is misused here. Most other Wikipedia articles list spelling as Chiloé, but because of my general opposition to the use of diacritics in the english wikipedia, I am proposing the name change as listed, as spelled by the IOC, who we use as our standard..Pvmoutside (talk) 19:03, 22 August 2011 (UTC)
- Support 300 post-1980 Google Book examples without a diacritic, compared to 3 with (either diacritic). Here is IOC. Kauffner (talk) 04:56, 23 August 2011 (UTC)
- Question.
First, can the proposer please reword to show at a glance and unambiguously that "Chiloe" is what is proposed, and not "Chiloé"? "Chiloe" appears in the code for this section, but it is not visible on the page above.[Thanks for fixing that. Still waiting for more opinions to surface.–N] "Chiloe" does seem to be the most common form in print in English. Just so it's on record here, Spanish has "Chiloé" as the standard form (see Chiloé Island, etc.); and the "ö" in English would be motivated by a wish to show that the word has three syllables, not just two (compare old spellings like "coördinate"). NoeticaTea? 07:43, 23 August 2011 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.