Talk:China–Cornell–Oxford Project
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Improving this Article
editI recently watched the documentary "Forks Over Knives" and became inspired to adopt a vegan lifestyle. What really convinced me to take the plunge, though, was this specific study. I would love to make information about this study accessible on Wikipedia so that others may also learn more about the findings of this study. I posted on the following three WikiProject talk pages requesting assistance: Wikiproject china, WikiProject Animal rights, and WikiProject Cornell University. I hope that if you are visiting this talk page that you will assist me in transforming this page into a great article! Thanks, Stephanie3460 (talk) 19:38, 26 August 2013 (UTC)
Proposed Organization
edit- Intro/Min findings
- Background/hsitroy of the study
- Involved parties
- Reasons/Motivations behind the study
- Note about the Quality/Comprehensiveness
- Findings
- Skepticism/Criticism
- Conclusion
Please feel free to alter the sections/sub-sections
Stephanie3460 (talk) 19:43, 26 August 2013 (UTC)
Hi
editI started this page, and yes it does still look a bit minimal. Have only read part of the study on line. Glad to help, if you let me know what I can do. Not a popular article, but I agree with you it has huge importance.
TonyClarke (talk) 20:44, 27 August 2013 (UTC)
- Good idea to get it in shape, Stephanie. I have it on my watchlist and I'll help out if I can. SlimVirgin (talk) 22:00, 30 August 2013 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on China–Cornell–Oxford Project. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100911215335/http://www.ctsu.ox.ac.uk/~china/monograph/ to http://www.ctsu.ox.ac.uk/~china/monograph/
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100911215335/http://www.ctsu.ox.ac.uk/~china/monograph/ to http://www.ctsu.ox.ac.uk/~china/monograph/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:34, 5 August 2017 (UTC)
Please merge this article
editMerge this article with the Wikipedia article The China Study which is a much longer article.Knox490 (talk) 01:40, 3 August 2020 (UTC)
Merge. Should be merged. Or both articles should be expanded with links to other article. BrikDuk (talk) 16:38, 21 August 2020 (UTC)- Don't merge. The China Study is an article about a book that devotes one chapter to this study. The study itself is the largest epidemiological study every conducted, and it makes sense to have a separate page to discuss the science. It certainly meets the Wikipedia standards for notability, and could be expanded considerably. RockMagnetist(talk) 18:24, 21 August 2020 (UTC)
- Don't merge. I change my vote to agree with RockMagnetist. The pages need to be better connected with internal links, references, and explanation of how the book and epidemiological study being related but separate BrikDuk (talk) 18:50, 21 August 2020 (UTC)