Talk:China–Kazakhstan relations
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the China–Kazakhstan relations article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | The use of the contentious topics procedure has been authorised by the community for pages related to Uyghurs, Uyghur genocide, or topics that are related to Uyghurs or Uyghur genocide, including this page. Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be sanctioned. |
![]() | A fact from China–Kazakhstan relations appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 16 October 2008, and was viewed approximately 2,110 times (disclaimer) (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
| ![]() |
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on China–Kazakhstan relations. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130729114103/http://news.huochepiao.com/2012-11/201211238443579.htm to http://news.huochepiao.com/2012-11/201211238443579.htm
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130729122839/http://news.huochepiao.com/2012-11/20121123914252.htm to http://news.huochepiao.com/2012-11/20121123914252.htm
- Added
{{dead link}}
tag to http://211.144.68.84:9998/91keshi/Public/File/41/337-6093/pdf/405.full.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:39, 5 August 2017 (UTC)
A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion
editThe following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 17:22, 25 July 2019 (UTC)
Not anything to do with diplomatic relations - pneomonia
editDiplomatic relations is about official country to country relationships between states. Talking about a Chinese warning of a virus, and the Kazahk gov telling its public that it's not true. That is undue weight as it barely touches on the core topic of relationships between states directly Let alone deserve its own entire dedicated chapter. It turns the article into Wikipedia:Coatrack articles. Noticed there's hardly any chapter for the more significant stuff like Kazakhstan government doing joint deals with Chinese government on nuclear development, which is far more significant of the relationship which is decades worth. And not a momentary few days news. Which is recentism. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Recentism 103.210.125.57 (talk) 03:05, 20 April 2023 (UTC)
- Comment: Your belief about the scope of the article is false. But in either case, this section provides sources and show this involves an alert by the Chinese govenment and the response from the Kazak government.
- As for WP:RECENTISM, this incident is from 2020. // Timothy :: talk 03:20, 20 April 2023 (UTC)
- Read the article. The Chinese embassy wasn't telling it to Kazakhstan gov. They were telling their own civillians to be careful. This isn't high level diplomatic direct relations. Also I don't see how it can have an own dedicated chapter for something that's not even a major talk between China and Kazakhstan. Btw Kazkah ministry of health later pointed that the virus did have abnormalities so wasn't that unreasonable to be wary but likely to be Covid misdiagnosed.[1]sh=63fd067c422a103.210.125.57 (talk) 03:26, 20 April 2023 (UTC)