Talk:China Investment Corporation
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the China Investment Corporation article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
Untitled
editI have attempted to wikify the article. Categorized information and trying to make more sense. --Zhongxin 13:37, 8 October 2007 (UTC)
Information is very scare because this is article is about a state owned company which is yet to formalize its existence. Hardly any information at this point in time. Maybe in the next month or so, the article will become clearer and more people will assist wikifying this article. --Zhongxin 13:39, 8 October 2007 (UTC)
Do you think I could write a article about Lou Jiwei? http://www.time.com/time/specials/2007/article/0,28804,1725112_1723512_1723577,00.html - He heads the corporation WhisperToMe (talk) 21:02, 3 April 2008 (UTC)
Please soften the general tone of the article. It shows an alarmist situation unsuitable by wikipedia standards. Objectivity required. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.80.130.134 (talk) 10:42, 1 May 2008 (UTC)
SEC Report
editFor addition to article: http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/02/08/AR2010020803681.html AniRaptor2001 (talk) 10:35, 9 February 2010 (UTC)
Bloomberg has done a study on the Chinese bond market. The value of CIC issued bonds in that study far exceeds the value quoted in this article. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.203.133.32 (talk) 18:24, 18 October 2010 (UTC)
Temasek Holdings?
editisn't CIC more like singapore's Government Investment Corporation (GIC)? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Government_of_Singapore_Investment_Corporation
Temasek is a holding company which was created to manage public company asset the country has. it does not receive further funding from the government and is more of an instrument of privatization. it makes investment from profits generated from it's asset or buy selling them.
while GIC is to manage the national currency reserved. also their name give it away too.
Holdings
editSomeone has added
Liverpool FC, August 5th, 2010, $900 Million, 97% stake[22]
with a fake reference.
This is pure speculation as there has not even been offered a bid from CIC yet. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.202.166.200 (talk) 09:42, 5 August 2010 (UTC)
The whole "investment strategies" section of this article is awful. There are a couple times where information repeats and it seems completely ad hoc. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.140.102.159 (talk) 23:02, 30 January 2011 (UTC)
Special Section for Manhattan
editThe island is beginning to boil over and a dedicated section of their activities might be of value.--Wikipietime (talk) 14:14, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on China Investment Corporation. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160927094338/http://www.ifswf.org/members to http://www.ifswf.org/members
- Added
{{dead link}}
tag to http://oxfordir.files.wordpress.com/2008/07/swf001.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:39, 5 August 2017 (UTC)
A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion
editThe following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 03:45, 6 October 2020 (UTC)
A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion
editThe following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 06:51, 30 June 2021 (UTC)