Talk:China Northern Airlines Flight 6136
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the China Northern Airlines Flight 6136 article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Censored
editThis article is being censored by unknown meat puppets re new claims of Chinese Govt sabotage. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 116.25.50.253 (talk) 22:43, 23 April 2012 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on China Northern Airlines Flight 6136. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100811223347/http://www.airdisaster.com/cgi-bin/view_details.cgi?date=05072002®=B-2138&airline=China+Northern+Airlines to http://www.airdisaster.com/cgi-bin/view_details.cgi?date=05072002®=B-2138&airline=China+Northern+Airlines
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:34, 26 December 2017 (UTC)
I dont think the plane crashed due to arson
editHe somehow managed to bring some gasoline aboard and then ignited it during the flight. Because of course no one would notice that 6 months after 9/11. That said, I was surprised by this: that most passengers, including Zhang, died of carbon monoxide inhalation. The engines, cabin floor, and other critical parts showed no signs of burning or explosion. So why couldn't the pilots put on their oxygen and just land?... Again a very weird plane crash and very sussy... results I'd take this page with a massive grain of salt, only the official report, which as far as I know was never publicly released, will have answers as to the progression of the fire and how it affected the outcome of the flight. LuanLoud (talk) 13:05, 29 September 2022 (UTC)